User talk:Hred0128

Problematic edit
Your recent edit to abortion was reverted because it was in violation of basic wikipedia policies. You copy and pasted copyrighted information from webpages. You can see under every edit window, the disclaimer Content that violates any copyright will be deleted. Also, your edits were not in line with WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:CS. We must attribute all content to reliable sources through citations. And we cannot present one side of a debates' view in isolation. We must remain neutral and not take sides. Copying and pasting from pro-life sources isn't any more neutral than copy and pasting from NARAL or Planned Parenthood (ignoring copyright issues for the sake of argument). Would you want to copy and paste information from one of those pro-choice organization's websites and add it to wikipedia?

If you have any questions about any of this, or how wikipedia works, feel free to ask.-Andrew c [talk] 15:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Your subsequent edits on 21 April reintroduced the same sort of material. Content on Wikipedia must be verifiable and linked to a reliable source. Additionally, it must accurately represent views in proportion to their representation among experts in a field. Your edits utilized a partisan source and presented material which the medical and scientific communities feel to be incorrect. The subject of abortion and breast cancer is dealt with elsewhere in the abortion article - rather than reinserting this material, please consider discussing the changes you'd like to see on the article talk page. MastCell Talk 22:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)