User talk:Hridaymohan roy

March 2020
Hello, I'm Thepenguin9online. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Flipkart—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 18:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amazon Web Services. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rooibos has been reverted. Your edit here to Rooibos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://weightloss769.blogspot.com/2020/03/red-tea.html, https://weightloss769.blogspot.com/2020/03/red-tea.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Rooibos, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. CLCStudent (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Stop attempting to add blog links or any other inappropriate external links or you will be reported to administration. CLCStudent (talk) 15:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

You just attempted again as indicated by the filter log. Now, I am forced to report you to administration. CLCStudent (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Flix11 (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)