User talk:Hrishikesh shirsat

Sorry to revert your edit on STS-93. In non-technical circumstances I would agree that "third" is better than "number three," but in this case, "number three engine" is the official designation of the engine in that position, whereas "third" suggests there's some order to the engines, and while there is a start-up sequence, that could well differ from the order of numbering for designations. So, in short, many thanks for the contribution, and many apologies for having unwound it. Happy editing!-- ke4roh (talk) 10:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)