User talk:Hshin025/Ameila Cornelius/Kishi123 Peer Review

Peer Review
The article was easy to follow from the beginning until the end. The lead clearly reflected the most important information about the artist. Although, there are a few grammar errors in some areas. However, it would be best to include in-text citations in each paragraph in order for people to know where the information came from. The sources varies between online websites and books. I think the sources you picked are reliable and it seems that you gathered information from a variety of sources. If possible, more information could be added to the education section because it is just one sentence. Instead, you could add this sentence into Biography section and The artworks could be divided into three different subheadings under the main heading of ‘Artworks’ so that it is easier to read and follow along. You could explain the reasons behind creating her pieces. If Amelia Cornelius has group exhibitions, it’s possible to The article has a neutral tone and does not include phrases, such as, “the best”. It doesn’t persuade the readers in any way, it simply gives facts and information. Some of the words could have links added to them. For example, if there is a wikipedia page about the Oneida Tribe, you could add a link. At the end, add an external link to the artist’s own website. Overall, the article was factual and sufficiently good. Kishi123 (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)