User talk:Hspitzer45

June 2015
Hello, I'm Howicus. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Josh Peck because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Peck. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Josh Peck was changed by Hspitzer45 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950307 on 2015-06-01T21:46:17+00:00.