User talk:Hsrc1234

May 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Homeland Security Market Research, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

The reason for removal is that it is wrong. I cannot think of any reason that could be more valid. I do not wish to argue back and forth on technicalities of wikipedia, I need to have this post either removed or corrected. I am an officer of the company. Feel free to write to info@hsrc.biz, I'll respond to verify my identity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsrc1234 (talk • contribs)


 * Please read WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide before you do any more edits. Your identity is otherwise irrelevant; all that counts on WP is that the information we present to the public is verifiable. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Who are you? The information you keep reverting to is WRONG. YOU ARE MISLEADING WIKIPEDIA READERS. Further, you are misleading our company's potential clients. I have no desire to advertise the company through wikipedia. I would rather the post is completely removed. Please just do your homework and look at the website. Next step is to find out whatever means I can in wikipedia to file a complaint against you for misusing whatever wikipedia rights you currently have. After that, its legal intervention. Just end this silliness now, please.

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 19:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)