User talk:Htownprod

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article
 * Tutorial
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! Fettlemap (talk) 21:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your response. Question. As a disabled veteran who served this great nation, I edited the Wikipedia pages Veterans' Access to Care through Choice, Accountability, and Transparency Act of 2014 and Veteran Access to Care Act of 2014 with credible and factual information.
 * [sic] "The Choice Act proposal was introduced to the late senator John McCain on several occasions by Phoenix AZ disabled veteran Ricky C. Barnes https://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/494376/ricky-c-barnes-has-been-inducted-into-the-prestigious-marquis-whos-who-biographical-registry who was also instrumental in the uncovering of the Phoenix VA Scandal. Mr. Barnes led his campaign from 1999 to 2014 seeking non-VA healthcare for all veterans which led to the signing of the Veteran Access to Care Act of 2014, by President Barack Obama."
 * The above information is factual and accurate. I was informed by Matthew Dann of your team that a published article but be provided which I finally had a prestigious publishing company publish my information by way of researching provided information which was approved. I accomplished all tasked that I was informed to accomplish so I'm still wondering how is the provided credible edited changes not considered a positive contribution when the added information is factual? If you could please inform me of what else is required to get this information on Wikipedia it would be greatly appreciated. I believe al disabled veterans who served this nation, and made valid positive contributions to the development of our society should receive that recognition. I'm optimistic that is exactly how your company feels as well.
 * Regards,
 * Mr. Ricky C. Barnes
 * Veteran Advocate   Htownprod (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, that’s understandable. And if that is the case, can you add the creditable information where it belongs or inform me where I can present the credible information at what point that is coming from a reliable publication? If you can pin-point where I should present the information I can move forward in good faith to insure I follow your guidelines. I can also provide news videos confirming the validity of the information. Thank you for whatever you can do.
 * Regards,
 * Mr. Ricky Barnes
 * Veteran Advocate Htownprod (talk) 04:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

New content doesn't belong in lead at the top of the article but must be added at an appropriate section in the article. The lead is a summary of the article content, not a place for new content. Please note that all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Cheers, Fettlemap (talk) 03:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)