User talk:Hu981j

February 2018
Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Icke have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Meters (talk) 03:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan Muslim League (N). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:33, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pakistan Muslim League (N) was changed by Hu981j (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874497 on 2018-02-04T12:33:29+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-predator adaptation, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 13:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Colleagues, for the record I do not believe this editor is a vandal at all - see my comments below. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Accused on vandalism
Hello! There is a complaint on me for vandalism.But all the editing I have done is based on facts.On David Icke I added that he has its contributions on exposing New World Order.Which is 100% valid.He has his numerous conspiracy theories on which he is exposing New World Order.He has lived his entire life working for anti New World Order. Hu981j (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm really sorry you're getting kicked for supposed vandalism. It seems quite clear to me that you mean well and are trying to edit constructively. However, there is a certain minimum level of competence required for editors to contribute usefully here at Wikipedia, and this involves your understanding how to write clear and accurate English, to locate suitable reliable sources, and to cite those sources in the same style as other citations in the same article, most likely by using . Please find out about these things and practice in your own sandbox until you are comfortable editing in this style. It will help if you carefully examine some well-written articles to see how they have been edited and cited. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * The edit I warned Hu981j for was simply incomprehensible. I gave him a level 1 unconstructive editing warning, which does not mention vandalism and does not assume bad faith. The ClueBot NG  undo diff is not accurate since it only shows Hu981j's second edit. The actual undo  by the bot also included this grossly WP:POV material . After seeing the unsourced commentary "Nawaz Sharif's family must be punished" and "PMLN is considered as the most corrupt political party in the history of Pakistan" I completely agree with the bot's revert. I would likely have cited POV rather than vandalism, but I doubt the bot can make those distinctions, and many human editors would likely have simply called it vandalism. I agree that the later edits to Anti-predator adaptation undone by you and user:Dirkbb appear to incompetent but good faith, rather than vandalism. Hu981j should read WP:RS, WP:POV, and WP:CIR, and is free to remove the warnings of course. Meters (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)