User talk:HubertClarence

Nota Bena
Hello,

I am busy just now but i will post some information where you can find the ifnormation youa re looking for, i will also respond to your questions as well. just got a few personal things to do, i am also waiting on another assessor agree with wha ti said if so i can easily reclass it c class, but another assessor might think it pass b class so it could be that as well hence why i aint re rated it. stub is what you described.-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 21:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok here is the Assessment scale
 * Unrelibel soures are 5,6 and 8 i also suspect 1,9,10,11 might fail see Realible sources
 * upload stuff here upload use one of the templates that best descfribes the image and then fill out all the required information in the parameters, but it might sitllg et deleted if someone tihnks there is a free image out there.
 * the article is c class i have rerated it, it iwll need a bit mor work for b class-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 16:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem, if you did turn it into a advert then it would get deleted very fast. You could always ask your software to be review by somewhere like pc rpo pc world or something similar and it get you some reference for it. if you own the images then you do not need ot worry about copyright you can just say you give wikipedia the rights to use the images. At the end of the day the article only fails assessment quailty to be rated higher, it does nto mean it does not convey the topic, i am a littl emore leminent on this type of thing some hwoever would be more strict and want it deleted for the way it is. i beleive in making it better and than not everything can be sourced realible so the article remains at a low rating but still remains for others to use (edit i am strict on teh ratings though because i do not want ot rate a article higher than it worth and make peop think it a better article)-- Andy ( talk  -  contrib ) 16:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)