User talk:Hubert de Lhoneux

Welcome!
Hello, Hubert de Lhoneux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Paul de Man did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. David Brooks (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm DavidBrooks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Paul de Man, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 22:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Hendrik de Man
Thanks David. I still disagree with the sentence : "For a year Henri de Man was appointed as de facto puppet Prime Minister of Belgium under the Nazis". Have a good day. Hubert de Lhoneux (talk) 06:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * That's perfectly valid, but if you can rewrite the actual text and support your change with a reliable source, then go ahead. An encyclopedia is not the place for marginal notes. And, as I said, if you think the matter is likely to be controversial, please start a discussion on the article's talk page and call on the most recent editor to join in (it's often a fruitful step). It may also be proper to document the different historical interpretations on the article itself (historian x considers him effectively an appointed puppet, but historian y disagrees), so long as both have reliable sources.


 * If you want help constructing a reference, please let me know. The best way to attract my attention is by a note on my talk page or a callout (e.g. . David Brooks (talk) 14:40, 6 August 2019 (UTC)