User talk:Hubinfo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I had mistakenly tagged your page for deletion because of copyright problems. I was thought I was wrong because it is on a user page, and I assume you are going to improve the article before placing it under its article name, which would be Hubinfo instead of User:Hubinfo.

Copyrighted material, also from your own / your company's own web page must not be placed into Wikipedia. Please also consider that writing an article about your own company might constitute a conflict of interest.

Happy editing! --Pgallert (talk) 09:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Follow-Up: Someone else has by now deleted your contribution because of advertising. I suggest you practice in your User:Hubinfo/Sandbox to produce your first article, and only put it online once it is neutrally worded and free of copyright infringements. --Pgallert (talk) 10:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, The Hub: Campaign for quality school libraries in Australia is a loose knit group of dedicated advocates from around Australia. It is not a company. Is not for profit. And I wrote most of the static pages on the original site. The Entry should be called The Hub: Campaign for quality school libraries in Australia Ta, Georgia Phillips


 * Hi Georgia, it doesn't actually matter whether it is for profit or not. An article about this group should be neutrally worded, just like you would read it in a paper encyclopedia (Thus, We are a gathering of educators united by a common concern is not appropriate), and it should be properly sourced whenever it makes non-trivial assertions. For instance, you should provide external sources e.g. for claims like:
 * "Research has consistently shown that"
 * "[A]necdotal evidence tells us that library budgets have plummeted"
 * Additionally, you should somehow show that the Hub is notable. This is usually done by providing evidence that someone else than Hub wrote about Hub. Otherwise I fear the article will not live long on Wikipedia.
 * Finally, you might not have noticed that in its current form the article is not a Wikipedia entry. It currently resides on your user page, and this page is typically used for more or less private information about the account holder. Hope this helps --Pgallert (talk) 10:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Follow-Up 2: Page has again be deleted. Please do not re-create it in its current form; this is against policy and you might be warned, even blocked, for that. Try to re-word and provide sources, and keep the article in the sandbox (click on the red link in my first follow-up) until it is ready. I can help you write it if you want. --Pgallert (talk) 10:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)