User talk:Huelam987

Edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Celia Homeford (talk) 10:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Persistent reverts
Your recent editing history at Alexandra Feodorovna (Charlotte of Prussia) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz
Your changes to the article have been repeatedly reverted by other editors. According to WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, you should start a discussion on the article talk page. Otherwise you risk being blocked for edit warring. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

You're still incorrectly tagging edits as minor when they are not. DrKay (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Please note that swapping images doesn't count as a minor edit. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Do not tag the addition of images as minor edits. This is at least the fourth time you've had to be told. DrKay (talk) 08:47, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

You just did it again, just minutes after being reminded not to. DrKay (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pedro I of Brazil, you may be blocked from editing. You've just tagged another edit as minor even though you've been advised half-a-dozen times that this is inappropriate. Inappropriate behavior is disruptive. DrKay (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Elisabeth Ludovika of Bavaria, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Marie of Prussia
Hi Huelam987. I hope, but actually I'm not convinced at all, that your persistent edit about Marie of Prussia depends by a lack of informations from your part. So I will gently explain you a thing. That photo of Marie depicts the Queen not in a "court dress" as you wrote several times, trying to change it, but with a "fancy dress": i.e. it's not an official photographic portrait, but a "souvenir" of a funny day (a ball in Rococo Louis XV style). So not at all something particularly suitable for a simple biography of a Queen (that photo is nice but it could have a sense with a specific contextualization, for example in a page about royal fancy balls in the XIX century). The court dress at the time of Marie of Prussia was like that one (you can search also the beautiful film Ludwig by Luchino Visconti: in the first scene, Ludwig's coronation, the actress playing Marie of Prussia wears a perfect reproduction of the court dress of that time). I have to say that I'm not so convinced that you don't know of this error, because on Commons there was already a photo of Marie (alone) with that fancy dress, and above all it was clearly written that the Queen wears a ball attire. But you preferred to upload a new file, cropping the image of the Queen from another photo, but without copying all the informations too. Why didn't you use directly the photo of the Queen alone? Because you couldn't erase informations about the fancy ball? Or do you just want to use always a file that you personally uploaded? I remind you that Wikipedia is a collective project and no article is a property of someone. Once I wrote you: because you are a Vietnamite with this huge passion for European Queens, why don't you use your forces to translate biographies from en.wiki to Vietnamite wiki? I see that there is a lot of work to do in that sense in your Wikipedia. It would be a good work to do. Thanks for your attention.--Kaho Mitsuki (talk) 14:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Maria Feodorovna (Dagmar of Denmark) while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)