User talk:Huey2323

Nomination of StableCoin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StableCoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/StableCoin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citation Needed &#x007C;  Talk  20:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page StableCoin has been reverted. Your edit here to StableCoin was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://marketaffair.blogspot.com/2013/12/why-stablecoin-is-better-and-cheaper.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring on Cryptocurrency page
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

I see that you have been repeatedly adding the same content on Cryptocurrency. Other editors have provided reasons for the removal, and I suggest you discuss the addition on the talk page before adding it again, in order to avoid the perception that you are edit warring. If you have questions, let me know.Dialectric (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Much sad, very disapoint.
I invited you and the rest of the StableCoin community on /g/ to a civil discussion and for a chance to help improve your coin's article, and instead you accuse established, neutral Wikipedians of having an agenda. I still think in the future that it will be notable enough to warrant being on Wikipedia like Dogecoin or Primecoin, but in the mean time, I simply don't see it. I wish the best of luck to you if you choose to stay editing on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citation Needed (talk • contribs) 20:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have seen no such invite as I do not frequent /g/ (or 4chan for that matter). Having an open discussion for everyone to see is fine with me. 64.184.10.69 (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

I you to assume good faith and refrain from personal attacks. Instead you by making another baseless attack against a contributor. Please be aware that this behavior routinely gets people blocked from editing, and you can expect it if you continue on this path. Lagrange613 21:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, where was the personal attack after the warning? 64.184.10.69 (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citation Needed (talk • contribs) 23:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Archived https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive826#User:Huey2323_and_bad_faith_accusations. Huey2323 (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)