User talk:Huggiesbabe

June 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Please also see Wikipedia's guideline on spoilers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 02:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Vampire Academy (novel) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 7 07:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Vampire Academy (novel), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and, most recently, egregious and repeated copyright violation. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene talk 16:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

We can't overlook copyright violation because it could place Wikipedia in legal difficulties. If you intend to request an unblock, you'll need to read the links in the above message and indicate that you understand and accept why this is a serious issue. EyeSerene talk 16:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)