User talk:Huggins101

Speedy deletion of Jimmy Lannon
A tag has been placed on Jimmy Lannon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 15:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jimmy Lannon
A tag has been placed on Jimmy Lannon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 15:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jimmy Lannon
A tag has been placed on Jimmy Lannon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop
Please stop recreating this page. It's not an encyclopedia article. Friday (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

What's going on? Are you trying to drive traffic to some domain parking service? I have blocked you from editing for now, until you explain yourself. You cannot use Wikipedia for advertising, if that's what you're trying to do. Friday (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Err.. You're adding links to websites that don't exist. Was this on purpose? You can still edit this page, even while blocked, so it may be best to reply here to keep things together. Friday (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

I have unblocked you for now. But please take care when adding external links. A person or group's own official website is generally going to be an acceptable link, but you added a few to sites that didn't even work. See External links for more info. Friday (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The other important thing to know is that here we're an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. The content of the Jimmy Lannon article looked like marketing copy, not an encyclopedia article. Here we're way more boring than that- we don't say things like "Awesome guy." Friday (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)