User talk:Huggyprincess

A tag has been placed on Highrollers with Heart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Stezton 18:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hrwh.jpg
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Hrwh.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you. Corvus cornix talk  20:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to I Love Money has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk ♦  contribs  15:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to I Love Money constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 19:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ophois (talk) 03:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Discussing changes
Hello, I notice that you keep reintroducing changes to the Rock of Love: Charm School article without making any attempt at discussing it at the appropriate talk page. Please refrain from making further reverts to the article without doing so, as it is not constructive. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 22:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, that tone tag was up on the section for a reason. There's a clear section on the talk page if you want to discuss it. But please do not blindly remove maintenance tags if you aren't going to fix the underlying problem. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 17:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

About synopses in Rock of Love: Charm School
Hi there, Huggy- I really would like to thank you for taking the time to write the detailed episode synopses for the Rock of Love: Charm School episodes. However, I'd like to give you a few pointers to help enhance your contributions. I hope this helps! Thanks again for your contributions! &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 04:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * First and foremost, you need to work on the tone of your contributions- by this I specifically mean your contributions aren't worded in a formal, business-like tone. One sentence that comes to mind is this one:"When asked if she had a problem with anybody in the house, Destiney said she didn't really understood why Kristy Joe was still there, and Kristy Joe got a little upset about it."A better way of phrasing it would be like this:"When asked for her opinion of the other contestants, Destiney suggested that Kristy Joe might not belong on the show any longer. Kristy Joe's reaction was to become slightly upset."While I'm sure that's not perfect, and I'm not saying you should go and put that in verbatim, I think it's something to think about. Phrases like "didn't really understand" and "a little upset", and the use of sentences with a long series of subordinate clauses doesn't make for good or featured articles.
 * A neutral point of view is critical to article writing on Wikipedia, and I believe you're carrying over a stilted point of view from how certain events are portrayed in the episode. For example, in various synopses, you have painted Lacey as being manipulative. While the show pushes that point of view, we need to be careful, especially as the events in these shows may constitute part of a biography of living persons.
 * Additionally, you might want to check into the Manual of Style for writing about fiction. While one could argue that as a reality show, this isn't necessary, the producers put a lot of spin on the events in the show. For example, like I said above, the show tends to paint Lacey as being evil and manipulative. We generally shouldn't carry this directly over.
 * Something else you might want try is to be more concise. I don't have a particular example in mind, but it wouldn't hurt to read the advice in that link.
 * Finally, you really should participate in the discussion process for a page before blindly making changes, as indicated in my prior message. I notice that you've made extremely few contributions to article talk pages, and none to others. Other editors may take strong offense to this, and it can suggest that you think you own the articles you work on.

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Madagascar (2005 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Highrollers with Heart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Highrollers with Heart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Highrollers with Heart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri  TALK  20:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Austin John Winkler unsourced info
Hallo, I have reverted your edit to Austin John Winkler because Wikipedia does not include unsourced content, especially about living people. If you have a Reliable Source you can cite which contains the information you added, then by all means add it again, with the source. Thanks. Pam D  18:11, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I tried citing it, feel free to fix it, I'm still new to all of this. Huggyprincess (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)