User talk:Hugh Mason

Landmark Trust category
Following up your idea I've created Category:Landmark Trust properties in the United Kingdom Best Wishes Saga City 14:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

RFC creative industries
Hello this is a comment from Alan XAX Freeman. I have made a few suggestions for improvements on Creative Industries page - see bottom of the talk page. How do you feel about these suggestions?

Alan XAX Freeman 07:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Spam?
I am mystified as to how an editor of your experience could write Speaking Circles and not make the slightest attempt to show that the subject is notable. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of unfortunately-named Brands
I have nominated List of unfortunately-named Brands, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of unfortunately-named Brands. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  Ravenswing  20:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I absolutely loved your list, but I'm afraid Ravenswing is right. Sorry.   SIS   01:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks SIS x It's a harsh result for those of us trying to bring a little more humor into this world, but a fair one Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 07:38, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I just found all is not lost, The Knowledge is available elsewhere: http://www.dazbert.co.uk/sites/rudefood/ Enjoy ;-)   SIS   14:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL that's hilarious! What a great find. Many thanks for a belly laugh on a wet saturday evening here in England! Hugh Mason (talk • contribs 21:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

February 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. + m t  17:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank You For Your Kind Words
I really appreciate them. I took only one class on the subject, therefore I cannot consider myself an expert; however, I do believe that it is extraordinarily good at explaining human personality. --NBahn (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Infilms! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Howard Stableford -

Talk pages
Remember to leave messages on people's talk pages rather than their user pages, as the "You have new messages!" box only comes up after talk page edits. I left BenediktG a note on his talk page referring him to his user page. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 07:51, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * No worries. It's good there seems to be a group of editors interested in crowd funding... I'm curious to see how the article will look in a few weeks.


 * By the way, do you know you can get your username changed if you want article histories and so on to match your signature? Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 13:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your user name change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you.  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 14:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Hayes (sculptor)


The article Peter Hayes (sculptor) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-nonnotable sculpture without independent sources for 3 years now. Only sources I can find are self-published.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Debee Ashby
I have removed material from that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.

NB the IMDB link was dead, and the IMDB is not regarded as a reliable source.--Scott Mac 09:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Digistar 3 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digistar 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Digistar 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  07:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Transactional Analysis Association


The article International Transactional Analysis Association has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Balesin Island) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Balesin Island, Hugh Mason!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice article, but could you please provide references? Thanks."

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 Onel 5969  TT me 18:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balesin Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagalog ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Balesin_Island check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Balesin_Island?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenneth Mason (geographer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brevet ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kenneth_Mason_%28geographer%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kenneth_Mason_%28geographer%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Howard Stableford


The article Howard Stableford has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 23:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Howard Stableford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howard Stableford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Howard Stableford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 22:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know that this discussion is in progress Hugh Mason (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Melissa Clark-Reynolds
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

John Patrick Hawker moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to John Patrick Hawker. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  ❯❯❯  Chunky aka Al Kashmiri   (✍️) 02:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you - I agree that notability is critical. I had assumed that being honoured as a member of the Order of the British Empire would establish this (doesn’t get much better than a medal from a Sovereign!) and the fact of that award is confirmed in the linked article listing awardees honoured in 2006. So unpacking your helpful comment: are you suggesting that I should include citations to justify the significance of a national medal (I am not sure that is within the scope of this article) or is your comment that the article needs more citations in general? I appreciate your support to strengthen this draft. Hugh Mason (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John Patrick Hawker
Hello, Hugh Mason. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Patrick Hawker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)