User talk:Hughes 535

Hello, Hughes 535. The article you created at Stephen Richard Hughes was deleted as An article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject, criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section. Since it appears to be about you, I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page. Hope this helps. -- PFHLai 02:50, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Liverpool Physical Society


The article Liverpool Physical Society has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''Non-notable university society that does not meet WP:GNG.

Since possibly relevant, I am this year's society Vice President and still see no reason for this article.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Samwalton9 (talk) 13:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Liverpool Physical Society for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liverpool Physical Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liverpool Physical Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Samwalton9 (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)