User talk:Hugo1009

NowCommons: File:Canada11.jpg
File:Canada11.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Canada11.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

2010 Canadian Championship
In the Matches section click on show. Then click on correction. It will link you to http://canadasoccer.com/tourney/FIFA_Clubs/national.asp?Press_ID=4218 which indicates that there was a goal correction. One source. All previous sources are incorrect based on the match report. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please read the Manual of Style and its sub-pages? HRs are to be used sparingly, and that was not sparing. It wasn't my idea to add the line-ups. It is their presence that makes the whole thing difficult to read. Also, "numbers with five or more digits to the left of the decimal point (i.e., 10,000 or more) should be delimited into groups so they can be easily parsed, such as by using commas every three digits". I reverted. We're all learning. Thanks for your vigilance. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * While it hasn't been used in past matches it's standard in the tables. I will add it to the past years if you insist. If you have any concerns please bring them up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. By the way, you also deleted an unrelated change (updating the date) when you reverted the part you didn't like. Please take care when reverting. Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It doesn't look like the "Miracle in Montreal" was legit. Vancouver is not the same team this year and Montreal intentionally played its second string last year. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * i think you misunderstand me look we need to open up a discusion page on the ramdom "c" you want to place on the tables, maybe get a editor to look over it i don't feel like fighting with you about it okay. In till then i would appreciate for you to change them back thank you for understanding User:hugo1009 (talk) 03:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

First, it's not a random C. Please take a look at any other football championship such as 2009–10 Premier League, 2009–10 Fußball-Bundesliga, etc. The (C) is controversial but it is placed on each table, albeit next to the champion's name, not in the notes. That's why I suggested you take it up on the Football project page, which you didn't. You're not much of a team player are you? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Once again you are bringing in to much emotion into wikipedia. If you want to debat about how many subs montreal used yesterday i suggest you go to Big soccer or voyagers.com forums. Lets leave wikipedia and my talk page for real discusions. Once again thank you for understanding i see your point on the (C) but because it hasn't been used in the pass we should let our peers discuss this issue, or make a discussion to add a (C) seen on 2009–10 Premier League. Wikipedia is about peers working together to reach a common goal. Not one person changeing the whole history of one competition to fit what he likes. I am greaty sorry for this misunderstanding. I hope to be working with you on many more canadian championship pages. thank you Hugo1009 (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Point of clarification: It's not so much what I like (although this has been the case with the omission of a comma in the attendance numbers) but more about whether a Wikipedia football fan will feel like the competition articles will feel familiar or not. You're doing good work on the edits by the way. I also perceive that English is not your first language which makes your efforts even more impressive. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * i can see where you are coming from though. Just to me the (C) may have been in teh wrong area like instead of in a note colume it could of been beside the l'équipe who won. But it doesn't matter. I also completey aggree with you about the comma in the attendance numbers. I would like to thank you for bringing that rule alight to me. also to my understanding your first lauguage may not be english either. Also with the addition of FC Edmonton in the 2011 canadian championship we should maybe start a discussion on how that page will be handled. But by all means that is pretty far away. sorry for the misunderstandings Hugo1009 (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/EditBotsports for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:52, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I see you're back
You're just as uncooperative as last year. I've taken this to the football working group. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

thank you for the welcome. its that time of year again.Hugo1009 (talk) 21:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Cox (football)


The article Michael Cox (football) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. —WFC— 15:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Stony Monday Riot Supporters Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stony Monday Riot Supporters Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stony Monday Riot Supporters Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Lourdes  02:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)