User talk:Hugo999/Archive 11

New Zealand politics task force
To join the New Zealand politics taskforce, please place the following on your user page:

Category:Wine regions of Bulgaria
Category:Wine regions of Bulgaria, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Wine regions. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

"Captain Flint" (character listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect &. Since you had some involvement with the "Captain Flint" (character redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.

Medal Summary
The 2013 Asian Air Gun Championships were held in Tehran, Iran between December 20 and October 25, 2013.

Medal table
Ranking by all medals: Senior, Junior and Youth

2016 Asian Air Gun Championships Medal table
Ranking by all medals: Senior, Junior and Youth

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Railway electrification in New Zealand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Zealand Railways and NZR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:6th-century Islam has been nominated for discussion
Category:6th-century Islam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Marjorie Garman listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marjorie Garman. Since you had some involvement with the Marjorie Garman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DuncanHill (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Drury station
Hello, I'm very pleased to see that, where they were lacking, you're inserting opening dates for stations in the Auckland network, and apparently you're using a very good source. So thank you for that. However, I have a concern about your changes to Drury railway station, where you changed the wording to show that the station was on the Southern Line. The problem I have is that I'm not clear whether "Southern Line" was the name of the service that ran (until the closure of Drury in 1972). The terminology might have been "Pukekohe Line" or something else, so maybe we can't say that Drury was "on the Southern Line" because maybe that term didn't come into existence until later. I don't have your book, so I'd like you to check that it definitely uses the term "Southern Line" when referring to Drury.

The second thing is that it's phrased not quite correctly. The correct wording should be that it was located on the NIMT line, and Southern Line services ran to Pukekohe via it. It has concerned me for some time that most of the station articles are loosely worded, and I've been trying whenever possible to make a clear distinction between designated lines, such as the Newmarket Line, the North Auckland Line, and the NIMT Line, and the four service lines they carry, Western Line, Eastern Line, Southern Line, and Onehunga Line. Akld guy (talk) 00:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Re Drury Station, Juliet Scoble says by the Drury entry “Auckland-Waikato” (Railway), but I wanted to link to the present name. The article Southern Line, Auckland has a section labelled “Stations on the line” which includes Drury and other closed stations. So the Southern Line seems to refer to a section of line or section of the North Island Main Trunk as well as to the trains running on it. Hence could station articles like these say “The Southern Line section of the NIMT?
 * NB in Wellington Kapiti Line refers to a section of the NIMT which was formerly the Paraparaumu Line or Paekakariki Line before the electrified suburban section was extended. Hugo999 (talk) 05:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * [C]ould station articles like these say “The Southern Line section of the NIMT? I'm really uncomfortable with that phraseology. It might lead a reader to suppose that 'Southern Line' is a dedicated section of track, but it's not, and here is an illustration of why the term shouldn't be used that way. Between Newmarket and Westfield Junction, Southern Line services run on a portion of the North Auckland Line (designation NAL). Imagine that you referred to that section of the NAL as the Southern Line section. Now imagine there was some incident that forced the closure of that section of the NAL, and Southern Line services had to be rerouted east of Britomart via Glen Innes and Panmure for a time so that they could follow the NIMT route (in its entirety) to Papakura. Would an existing statement referring to the Southern Line portion of the NAL still be valid? No, it wouldn't. Service routes such as 'Southern Line' shouldn't be used to define sections of track, because, although unlikely, they can be rerouted. Therefore, I think the only proper solution is to use landmarks to describe the limits of sections of track. The rerouting situation could become more likely when the City Rail Link comes into operation in 3 years or so, and if the Avondale-Southdown Line goes ahead. Both sets of track will provide more route diversity. Akld guy (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

yarloop workshops
it was the remaining workshop of its sort in western australia - it was a railway workshop - was burnt down - I would suggest technology is a bit out of range what it was known as - cheers - keep up the good work! JarrahTree 14:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:9th-century Russian people has been nominated for discussion
Category:9th-century Russian people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:1st century in Egypt has been nominated for discussion
Category:1st century in Egypt, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:195 by country


A tag has been placed on Category:195 by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 23:29, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Agree with deletion of categories "195 by country" and "196 by country" but not categories "195 by continent" and "196 by continent" Hugo999 (talk) 23:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:1920 in Northern Ireland sport has been nominated for discussion
Category:1920 in Northern Ireland sport, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Television series by century has been nominated for discussion
Category:Television series by century, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Rotary system
Hi. Re: your good faith addition of an image to the above article. I had to remove the image because the Strowger system has no similarity whatsoever to the Rotary system, although both systems have line finders. Akld guy (talk) 06:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC) OK, agree with retaining image in both articles. The first Wellington rotary exchanges (Courtenay Place & Wellington South) cutover on 18 October 1919, and there are some pictures (probably of Courtenay Place, which with Wellington Central served the Wellington CBD) in the Free Lance of 22 October page 15 (search Papers Past for “exchange”). Re noise, I recall the interworking registers in the old Wellington Central II in Stout Street; very noisy. Made by the British suppliers, they had 4 or 5 uniselectors. During setting up a call, one u/s was working all the time, if one u/s stopped another started. And during the busy hour after one call it would immediately start on another call! Hugo999 (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Rugby league cats
Hi there, I've seen that you've tweaked a few cats. My query would be that by assigning a nationality to the list, one might, quite reasonably assume that the entire list is British, Australian, or whatever it has been refined to. I know that you were making it clearer that the club what British or Australian, but the refinement may through up a few questions.Fleets (talk) 11:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * While club players are often imported from other clubs or countries, players for a club e.g. say Brisbane Broncos are categorised by club into a subcategory of Australian rugby league players. Hence it seems OK to classify say lists of Brisbane Broncos players in the category Category:Lists of Australian rugby league footballers rather than in the category “Australian rugby league lists” (of which it is now in a subcategory of anyway; and the new category is also now a subcategory of “Lists of Australian sportspeople”). Hugo999 (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:1806 establishments in Poland has been nominated for discussion
Category:1806 establishments in Poland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Years of the 5th century in Asia
Category:Years of the 1st century BC in Asia, Category:Years of the 3rd century in Asia, Category:Years of the 4th century in Asia and Category:Years of the 5th century in Asia are now empty and liable to be deleted, following Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_July_29. – Fayenatic  L ondon 07:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hatnotes
Good on you for taking an interest but would you mind checking that something isn't wikilinked before hatnoting it?


 * It might help if you set up a page like User:Keith-264/common.js and install importScript('User:Evad37/duplinks-alt.js'); so duplicated wikilinks show up in red letterboxes. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Well I try to avoid duplicate Wikilinks in the same paragraph/section but I think that more than one link to another article is justified in a long multisection article. Hugo999 (talk) 21:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You might but wiki doesn't Manual of Style/Linking

"Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead."

if you put more than one wikilink in the main text, someone will reverse it and your time will have been wasted. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 21:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi
I have expanded the article about Rikard Wolff. A very well known Swedish singer who sadly died today. Could you please take a look at that article. Any help is appreciated. Cheers.BabbaQ (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Looks good to me, but I am not an expert on actors (or Swedes)! Hugo999 (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Right of way (shipping)


The article Right of way (shipping) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This stub is in poor English, it is unclear in what it is trying to say and uses a term which navigational textbooks never use. There is no 'right of way', the regs only refer to a 'stand-on' vessel (see rule 17)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:680s BC in Europe


A tag has been placed on Category:680s BC in Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

New Zealand films by decade
Hi. Please see this discussion at WP:CFD. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Bert Cooksley
Calling him Bertie is a breach of the Common Name policy. I recall him as a big man and anyone calling him Bertie more than once would surely have been sat on! Eddaido (talk) 11:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * He was officially born and died as Bertie Victor Cooksley (thanks to his parents!) but I will look for an obituary to see what he was called then Hugo999 (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I've just done a Google check and I can say confidently the references to Bertie Cooksley will all have arisen from Wikipedia's mistake! This is the trouble, Wikipedia's enormously influential. Eddaido (talk) 23:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Copied from that article's talk page: "This man was on formal records Bertie but was never publicly known by that name. He was Bert. As evidence please look at this link to the Archives in his one-time electorate which will show you none but the official record uses Bertie." Eddaido (talk) 02:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Mathews


A tag has been placed on Eric Mathews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk &bull;&#32;contribs) 04:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from Canada's Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Year in sports category
I have noticed you going around adding to old wrestling articles the category say its in sports, such as here. Professional wrestling however is across wikipedia not considered a sport, it is entertainment. Just curious what your basis is to now be adding sport to all of these? I would recommend undoing these additions. Thanks -  Galatz Talk  14:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Upon further investigation I have noticed that your edits have been undone on other pages such as here by, who mentioned in his edit that it as well was not a sport. Again I request that you stop adding this to pages. I do thank you for adding the professional wrestling in state categories however during your clean up. -  Galatz Talk  14:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I appreciate the effort but it's just not accurate.★Trekker (talk) 15:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * While I added the category Category:Professional wrestling in Oregon to the article No Mercy (2008) (and some other articles on professional wrestling events); I did not create or alter the category itself, which like similar "by state" categories has the parent category Category:Wrestling in Oregon (a sport).  However the overall parent category  Category:Professional wrestling in the United States (and other countries) has two parent categories i.e. both as a sport and an entertainment. PS: Category:Professional wrestlers from Oregon (and other states?) classes them as sportspeople from Oregon. Hugo999 (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Its a bit confusing I think having wrestling as the parent category. Wrestling is obviously referring to the combat sport Wrestling. I would propose removing that as a parent category since they are not really the same thing, and professional wrestling is not a sport. -  Galatz Talk  19:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You could put up for Category:Categories for discussion that all the Professional Wrestling categories should be moved from the "Sports" categories to the "Entertainment events" categories, though the consensus might be to retain both parents. Though not being a fan personally, it could be argued that professional wrestlers are not competing to win (as in true sports!) Hugo999 (talk) 01:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Consensus was reached and all professional wrestling categories were removed from anything doing from sports, yet you are still adding them to sports categories. Please stop! -  Galatz Talk  03:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

No while it was perhaps under consideration, but when was consensus reached? I have not seen any discusion. Hugo999 (talk) 03:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I brought it to the wikiproject last week and made the changes several days ago. -  Galatz Talk  03:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Stone churches in the UK
Hi, are you aware that just about every extant church in the UK is constructed of stone, and an even higher proportion of the ones that no longer exist? Yes, there are a few notable modern brick churches, probably a few part-wood ones (the chapel at Halston Hall is timber-framed) etc but Category:Stone churches in the United Kingdom is going to be truly massive and probably not very useful. Does wonders for your edit count but the UK may not be as variant in construction material as some of the other categorised countries. - Sitush (talk) 09:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I think I will remove the category; though they are classed as limestone or sandstone churches. Hugo999 (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Some granite ones in Scotland! If you went down that road then perhaps your idea has legs. Eg: churches using clunch stone, ashlar etc. You've got me thinking now. - Sitush (talk) 09:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Why I undid your categorization
Please see Talk:The Two Georges. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (United States Senate election in New Hampshire, 2020) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating United States Senate election in New Hampshire, 2020, Hugo999!

Wikipedia editor TheSandDoctor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for creating this article. Please add some references as soon as reliable sources become available. Thank you again for your contribution. Happy editing & I hope that 2018 is a good year for you"

To reply, leave a comment on TheSandDoctor's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (United States Senate election in South Carolina, 2020) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating United States Senate election in South Carolina, 2020, Hugo999!

Wikipedia editor TheSandDoctor just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for creating this article. Please add some references as soon as reliable sources become available. Thank you again for your contribution. Happy editing & I hope that 2018 is a good year for you"

To reply, leave a comment on TheSandDoctor's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve United States Senate election in Oklahoma, 2020
Hi, I'm TheSandDoctor. Hugo999, thanks for creating United States Senate election in Oklahoma, 2020!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for creating this article. Please add some references as soon as reliable sources become available. Thank you again for your contribution. Happy editing & I hope that 2018 is a good year for you

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:29, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

References for articles on US Senate elections, 2020
The original United States Senate election in Oklahoma, 2020 article I created in 2016 (likewise for New Hampshire and South Carolina) were redirects to the general article on United States Senate elections in 2020 (as were most of the articles by state for 2020; hence they appear in the category 2020 in Oklahoma etc). Someone has replaced them with separate articles for Oklahoma etc, and they should provide the references! Hugo999 (talk) 09:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of United States Senate election in New Mexico, 2020 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United States Senate election in New Mexico, 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United States Senate election in New Mexico, 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 01:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Again, see above, I created this as a redirect to the general article on United States Senate elections, 2020 so the redirect could be recreated (it is one of 33 articles on 2020 Senate elections by state, and could have potential candidates added). Hugo999 (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Irish travellers and Romani
Hi, I just wanted to drop by and let you know that while both groups are often referred by to by the pejorative term "gypsy", they are not the same or related ethnic groups.★Trekker (talk) 10:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Short story collection categories
No disrespect and I'm glad that you're trying to bring some kind of conformance to these categories but I'd like to ask if there's any way that you can edit them a little less maybe? I'm getting hundreds of emails about how you're updating these categories. Again--I'm happy you are and I'm not trying to discourage you but if there's anyway to streamline editing them over and over again, that would be appreciated. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Well I am just adding "navseasoncats" to the categories for short story collections by year e.g. Category:1949 short story collections as this is the only category for books or works by year that does not have it or similar to aid navigation! Gee, hundreds of emails! Hugo999 (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I created all of these and I get emails when my watchlist is updated, so for these routine maintenance edits, I'm getting lots of emails. But you're doing good work, so don't let my slite annoyance stop any useful editing. Just a gentle request to try to consolidate these edits as much as possible (i.e. don't edit the same thing four or five times) but if that's what you need, that's what you need. Thanks. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hello John, happy new year to you. Not a biggie, but there have been several items on my watchlist today where edits by you are marked as minor that are not minor (for example 1 and 2 and 3). Help:Minor edit gives a definition of a minor edit as "a good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content should be flagged as minor edits" (emphasis as per the original). The second-to-last bullet point under the heading 'Things to remember' explains why this is a problem. Any queries, please ask (here's good).

Have a great, productive 2018 and keep up your good work.  Schwede 66  08:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018
== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)