User talk:Hugtrain

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 5)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hugtrain/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

 JTP (talk • contribs) 00:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hugtrain/sandbox


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as User:Hugtrain/sandbox, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  JTP (talk • contribs) 00:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Amtrak, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. '' Also, wikipedia can't advise anyone on what they should do as we have to maintain a neutral point of view at all times. Best, '' Field Marshal Aryan  ( talk ) 16:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello
IT is me Hugtrain (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronic Theater Controls


A tag has been placed on Electronic Theater Controls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Theroadislong (talk) 15:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Electronic Theater Controls moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Electronic Theater Controls, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I was so lost and confused when it published as a real article! Hugtrain (talk) 17:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Electronic Theater Controls has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Electronic Theater Controls. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Im sorry for confusing you today. I did not realize an article was already being drafted for the same exact thing. Hugtrain (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * The block was not based on your IPs, about which I know nothing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * is very to ; if there was no time gap between contributions, I'd call them entirely ❌. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hugtrain, what concerns me at this point is how much promotion you've engaged in. Not only the article about the company, but also Draft:Source Four, a brand name of the company. I know you say you have no connection to the company, but, given your actions, it is hard to believe.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I can totally understand why you see this. Reading the article, it feels more like something for a brochure or datasheet than an encyclopedia, but that's why it's still a draft: there's still time to revise it and make it more NPOV. I want to write an article about this fixture because it's a very common light in theaters all over the world. I plan to conduct some thorough research about it.
 * My explaination is: I was reading the ERS page and noticed the red links to the Source Four. I read on Wikipedia: Red link that "Create red links whenever a non-existent article with more information would help a reader understand the content of the article in which the red link will appear," so, after checking for an existing page, I assumed that that's what the writer of the ERS article was intending. I decided to start the draft because, as I said, it's a very common fixture. While writing the draft, I also noticed there was no ETC page. This was strange to me because they are also pretty well-known in the theater industry. I looked at the live articles (not drafts which is why I missed the rejected draft) and came across the page for Clay Paky, another reputable company. I decided in my hyperfixation to start a page for ETC in the same manner, talking about their facts, history, and awards. Then later in the day my account is blocked for sock-puppeting. I will admit that there is a suspicious gap in my account that the other's (Segatari's) fills, but I do not own this account. I also think that they are in Germany as the original article is in German, and I am in America. Do you have any other information to suspect me of sock-puppeting? If so, I'd be happy to answer any questions.Hugtrain (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock Request Revised
(Moved Above as per guidelines) Hugtrain (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Ping David notMD in reply to teahouse comment
For some reason there is a lot of confusion about who I am. I think 331dot is an administrator. Hugtrain (talk) 19:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)