User talk:Hugues1981

Speedy deletion of Discover banff tours
A tag has been placed on Discover banff tours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Answer
I would like to know how to modify the content for it to be ok for showing on wikipedia, please contact me ***@***.com. Ive also started a discussion on the matter on the article's discussion page if you would rather use that. Thanks.
 * Hi. First off, I blanked your email adress. That's never a good idea to post on the internet. It can still be found in the page history. Second, how to modify the article so that it meets the criteria for inclustion. The two main concerns here are notability and verifiability. More information on both can be found on WP:N and WP:V. An applied notability guideline for companies can be found at WP:CORP. Second, the article is written in a promotional tone, and seems to be here to promote the company. If the guidelines and policy I mentioned before are met, the article should still be presented from a neutral point of view WP:NPOV. We ask people who are directly involved with the subject they are writing about to be very reluctant in editing, as can be found in the guideline on conflicts of intrest WP:COI.
 * So, I've thrown a bunch of guidelines and policies at you. Should you all read that. Yes. But, you don't have to read it right now. Learn as you go. The worst that can happen is that your edits may be reverted. So what should you do to get an article. Well, make sure that the articles subject is notable. Make sure that the contents of the article are verifiable. Make sure that the article is written in a neutral tone. And especialy, read over WP:1ST, a guide to making your first article. Happy editing! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)