User talk:Huhu9001

Request for IP address block exemption
--UTRSBot (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. PhilKnight (talk) 09:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Human3015. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Muhammad have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Human 3015  Call me maybe!! • 14:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To  Human 3015 :Thank you for your help, but will that be considered as some kind of censorship? And how can I tell whether these citations are reliable or not in order to avoid "POV push by unreliable source"?--by Huhu9001 (talk) at 14:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Whatever you added to that article is not to be part of lead of the article, it can be added in criticism or in article Criticism of Muhammad. -- Human 3015  Call me maybe!! • 14:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To  Human 3015 :So is it suggested that doubts about the actual existance of some figure should be considered as criticism?--by Huhu9001 (talk) at 14:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * There are thousands of reliable sources that he existed, so your edit can't be part of lead, moreover you can question his "prophethood" or his claim that he is sent by God, but you can't question his existence specially in lead. -- Human 3015  Call me maybe!! • 14:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To  Human 3015 :I see, thank you.--by Huhu9001 (talk) at 14:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I'll add that you have added the same passage previously and were reverted. This is considered edit warring. If you add a contentious passage to an article, and it gets reverted, you should try to gain consensus on the article talk page first. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To Amatulić: I was just following the advice of the reverter. See the discussion above.--by Huhu9001 (talk) at 19:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was the first reverter, not the second. It's worth some discussion on that talk page, that's all I was saying. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * To Amatulić:Thank you. I've lost my interest in this edit.--by Huhu9001 (talk) at 19:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Andritolion. Your recent edit to Coat Corporation appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. andritolion (talk) 08:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)