User talk:Hujsg

Notability
Thank you for your work. Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:


 * contains significant coverage: it addresses the topic directly and in multiple paragraphs of detail. A source with only trivial or off-topic mentions of the subject doesn't count.
 * is a reliable source: it has a reliable publication process, or a suitable expert author (look up the reliability of common sources, or discuss). Newspapers and books usually meet this criteria, company and personal websites usually do not.
 * is independent of the subject: it isn't produced by the article's subject or someone similarly affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: the subject's press releases, autobiographies, website, and interviews.

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 15:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You may develop the draft by creating Draft:Shinobu Kocho if you want. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 15:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)