User talk:Humacher

Proposed deletion of Inasin
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Inasin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * This article does not meet the guidelines for inclusion. Wikipedia is not designed as a recipe book but as an encyclopedia. Articles must be properly sourced in order to demonstrate that they are indeed notable. Please see WP:N and WP:RS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JodyBtalk 12:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Tapey
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tapey, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://members.tripod.com/~daoey/tapey.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Tapey
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the article Tapey, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Inasin
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Shovon (talk) 12:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lubeg
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lubeg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * I can't identify this plant. A news article states it as Syzyglum lineatum but I was unable to obtain more data about this plant. This is probably a typo of Syzygium lineatum but I cannot find a source that this plant is called lubeg or lovak

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lenticel ( talk ) 06:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)