User talk:Human Rights Foundation

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Human Rights Foundation", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Human Rights Foundation
One problem with removing the sources is that now much of the article is unsourced. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

This username is NOT representing no one organization because "Human Rights Foundation" is a generic term which is describing a foundation which operates on the field of human rights. If you can make any connection between this username and an organization which have the exclusive right to use "Human Rights Foundation" than I request to change my username but otherwise because it's actually not representing a specific organization it's unnecessary. Removing sources which are WP:SELFSOURCE WP:PROMOTION WP:CITESPAM or WP:NOTADVOCATE are necessary in order to maintain the encyclopedic structure of Wikipedia. If you feel that now the article are "unsourced" than please consider requesting to delete that article. Human Rights Foundation (talk) 08:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please use templates carefully...
Ouch! You've used a template to send a to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. Winged Blades Godric 10:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your manner of interacting with another user, activites at Talk:Human Rights Foundation--is not productive for a collaborative community like our's.As such, you have been already told to amend your ways and we don't necessarily appreciate un-founded stubbornness.Thus,consider this to be your .  Winged Blades Godric  10:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Funny, exactly this what I posted on your talk page. Anything you do will hit back my friend specially when Wikimedia Foundation today will get involved. Human Rights Foundation (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

ANI..
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

May 2017
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Winged Blades of Godric has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  10:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it implies shared use, is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. DES (talk) 10:50, 17 May 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 11:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Here you go.
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice: You have also used the accounts and  to edit Human Rights Foundation. If you are to remain a member of the community and to return to editing, you will need to choose one of your accounts to use. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please read ABOVE
You will not be unblocked under that username. That alone is enough for any reviewing admin to refuse the unblock request. Additionally, you'll find most admins are unwilling to read a paragraph consisting of just short of 900 words. I suggest rethinking your approach. Choose a new username that adheres to WP:USERNAME and concisely address the blocking admin's problems with your edits. --Yamla (talk) 15:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Okay. Maybe I will agree with that if that page get moved! Move that page! You have read my 900 words don't you? Just a second I figure out a new username. But I not just want the name changed. I want a fresh account to avoid such a conversations show on my talking page.

NEW USERNAME

 * This username looks good for you DES? By the way I prefer using AES GCM :D DES is old and not secure. Do you don't want change your username?
 * Having just implemented AES in Galois/Counter Mode, that reference made me smile. I leave the unblock review to another admin, just wanted to post that. --Yamla (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, Forward_secrecy PFS (ECDHE) with RSA 4096 bit signature. I'm very strict guy in relation to security. Wikipedia have good infrastructure but I think Slow_loris can take down for a bit if coming from Tor_(anonymity_network). 2 days before I taken down the turk**hairlines.** with the same attack, but nobody will ever can proove that. I recommend to test yourself. :D Sorry for the reply, I still don't know how I can send message to another user. By the way : probably anyway need to approve the unblock. Human Rights Foundation (talk) 16:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The DES in DESiegel has nothing to do with encryption, by the way - see his userpage. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I think you should not decline because you have come back to wikipedia 12 days before of today as I see on your Talk:Dennis Brown. I also understand how good friend you and : but I kindly ask not to play here. Go and edit some article. As I said I will not close my eyes when some admins who protecting that trash article from being moved saying don't unblocking me if I promise not to edit that page. What is the justification of your request? You got money to protect that page? Tell me the truth. Move that sh** sorry to say but is NOT POSSIBLE ON WIKIPEDIA TO USE A PAGE EXLUSIVELY FOR BUSINESS WITHOUT HAVING ANY VALUABLE CITES OR SOURCES. You guys making Wikipedia look like a blog where such corporations even get protected regardless of Tabloid_journalism. Clear? In other words I think all admins who protecting A_Big_Piece_of_Garbage that's disgusting. You got payment reguraly from the Fox_Broadcasting_Company?? Let's see: Wikipedia ban daily mail That's interesting. Thank's but NOW you NEED TO MOVE THAT SHIT. Don't you think? Human Rights Foundation (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, that's about enough of that. Talk revoked and alt accounts blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)