User talk:Human like you

January 2017
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to The New York Times. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2003:77:4F1C:E496:45D8:EFEE:624B:6634 (talk) 11:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Morphou Bay. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2003:77:4F1C:E496:45D8:EFEE:624B:6634 (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:The_New_York_Times. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.187.155.192 (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I will not comment further on the baseless warnings of a stalker. -Human like you (talk) 05:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at The New York Times. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. The edit summary accuses another editor of being a stalker. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I suggest you check out the user's past movements and "contributions" before making judgment on me. Have you ever thought about WHY I might have made such a claim? -Human like you (talk) 12:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I looked into it and considered that. WP:NPA, the guideline on personal attacks, doesn't really draw any distinctions between justified and unjustified personal attacks, no matter how you may have been wronged. You've been provided with some links related to things like the Teahouse and dispute resolution procedures, so that would be the route to go rather than the name calling. EricEnfermero (Talk) 12:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2003:77:4F1D:B929:CC3B:3956:435B:2E58 (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2003:77:4F1F:A044:715C:EA84:913:75FC (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You've been warned per the outcome of this complaint. You may be blocked if you once again try to insert material sourced to dailysabah.com unless you get a prior consensus on a talk page. You might also consider asking at WP:RSN whether it is usable for these articles. EdJohnston (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. '' Persistent edit-warring behaviour, including removal of sourced material from articles with the spurious edit-summary of "POV pushing". Material in articles that you disagree with is not necessarily POV. When your edit is reverted, use the talk page. Also, poor behaviour on talk pages. Anonymous editors are editors as much as registered accounts. You do not have stalkers or followers; people are checking your edits purely because of your disruptive behaviour.  Black Kite (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Human like you, if you continue this way admins will be sorely tempted to block your account. The choice is yours. EdJohnston (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing to edit disruptively by edit-warring to unclose a closed discussion, after a previous final warning. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tusaş Engine Industries (January 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tusaş Engine Industries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  19:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2003:77:4F1F:D925:28A8:F946:AC16:C8AA (talk) 14:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tusaş Engine Industries (January 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tusaş Engine Industries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  22:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tusaş Engine Industries has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tusaş Engine Industries. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  04:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continuing to edit-war on multiple articles after your previous block for the same reason.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading your previous block with User:Constellation2023. Your next block is likely to be indefinite.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for evading your previous block with User:4world2read. As was mentioned above, your next block was likely to be indefinite, and so it is. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. However, it is now unlikely you will be unblocked, having used multiple sockpuppets to evade your block. Black Kite (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tusaş Engine Industries has been accepted
 Tusaş Engine Industries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Antonioatrylia (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.