User talk:Humanhunge

Speedy deletion nomination of Joanna Maria Azzi


A tag has been placed on Joanna Maria Azzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Joanna Maria Azzi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joanna Maria Azzi


A tag has been placed on Joanna Maria Azzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Joanna Maria Azzi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:07, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sebastián Benfeld Garcés


A tag has been placed on Sebastián Benfeld Garcés requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sebastián Benfeld Garcés, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Boyd. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Sebastián Benfeld Garcés for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sebastián Benfeld Garcés is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sebastián Benfeld Garcés until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Re Judith Duportail
I don't see the problem with tagging for notability. It's just a tag, not even a nomination for deletion; if other patrollers disagree, they're welcome to to remove the tag themselves. I myself am split on the issue, but can certainly see an argument for AfD nomination; that's the only reason that I'm tagging it. It's not because I unequivocally believe that it's not notable. We're all here to build an encyclopedia, and I'm flagging it for attention, not deletion. I don't quite understand the defensiveness. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 17:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Anyways, I'll retag after 24 hours, starting from my last comment, with the assumption of tacit agreement, if there's no reply. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 18:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Judith Duportail moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Judith Duportail, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 07:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jean-Pierre Tignol
Hello, Humanhunge,

Thank you for creating Jean-Pierre Tignol.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Notability requires substantial coverage about the subject (not by the subject) in reliable, independent sources (see WP:RS). Profiles on the subject's employer's website or other sources closely associated with the subject's work are not reliable references"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeanine Belkhodja.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Jeanine Belkhodja.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)