User talk:Humanism two

Welcome!

Hello, Humanism two, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Meera Nanda does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Further, all points of view must be given due weight.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or,   to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

RESPONSE TO WELCOME
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RESPONSE TO WELCOME, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ramakrishnavivekananda.info/vivekananda/volume_1/addresses_at_the_parliament/v1_c1_response_to_welcome.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gita Supersite
Hello Humanism two,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gita Supersite for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 13:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gita Supersite
Hello Humanism two,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gita Supersite for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Gita Supersite. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hinduphobic
Yes, the edits prior to yours at Hinduphobic were problematic. But blanking the page was not the proper response. Prior to the problematic edits, there was a perfectly valid redirect; you should have simply restored that. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Jaaron95. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Religion not the crying need of India because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jaaron95 (talk) 03:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Ghar Wapsi
I'm not getting involved in the dispute about what Ghar Wapsi is and isn't, but I have declined your speedy deletion request as that isn't what speedy deletion is for. WP:CSD is for a limited range of criteria that are fairly obvious and clear cut. This, to me, isn't either of those. You should discuss your points on the article talk page, and a consensus may be reached there. The article is unlikely to be deleted under CSD A7 (lack of indicated significance for an organised event) as there appears to be sufficient coverage of it. It would not a an uncontroversial deletion for the purposes of WP:PROD, so your only chance of deletion would be at WP:AFD, but I cannot really see that succeeding either. Peridon (talk) 13:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Religion not the crying need of India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

A warning
If you go on removing content without any discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Your removal of this content has been challenged, and it is up to you to put your case on the talk page in order for there to be a discussion on the matter. Peridon (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

ARBIPA notification
Your recent editing history appears to involve disregard for the Wikipedia policies. Please familiarise yourself with them and follow them in order to avoid sanctions under ARBIPA. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:38, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Zero Defect Zero Effect for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero Defect Zero Effect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zero Defect Zero Effect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jbh (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)