User talk:HumanxAnthro/Archive 10

Your GA nomination of Monster Max
The article Monster Max you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Monster Max for comments about the article, and Talk:Monster Max/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cukie Gherkin -- Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were


 * Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
 * Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
 * Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

You've been whacked with a wet trout
 Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 05:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for creating an extremely overblown AN thread [ permalink] (comparisons to Holocaust deniers; "I hope the article is free from tyranny"), then harassing a user who sided with the reported users ("Do you want me to report you ... I am not screwing around here!") and doubling down after being told to stop ("I just warned [them] to not enable the disruptive behavior Ssilvers got a section for"). Our administrative processes are not a cudgel for you to use to cow opponents into submission, nor a free-for-all where you can get away with saying anything. In light of your clean block log, this is a short block, but please understand that this was serious misbehavior, of the sort that can lead to an indefinite block if it becomes a recurring problem. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 16:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I am just going to respond to this nicely, because I at least would like to edit other articles on here without one incident unfairly preventing me from doing that. In fact, I was providing contributive edits to a video game article when this block began.
 * You have no idea how furious I am about this. I literally was about to throw my computer screen out the window over it! Since 2021, I have felt like I am on egg shells with others, trying not to get punished for things that do not warrant it, such as calling out edits I have interpreted to be out of ignorance or bad faith, because of other users accusing me of incivility or an inability to handle a disagreement. And frankly, it has affected by mental well-being when editing any article, because you never know what other user could do to you. And this discourse was honestly a traumatic reminder of previous experiences to me. To put it simply: I feel like I am being bossed around.
 * This is the first time a block has resulted from it, the equivalence of a criminal record in real-life. For my perspective, you blocked me (for a limited time, in all fairness) with misinterpretations of what I commented while letting Rome burn at the hands of another individual. If you feel your block was justified and the situation was completely different from how I described it, I will respect it. Frankly, you do not have to worry about whatever "misbehavior" took place at ANI happening again, because I am not commenting there again. Honestly, I do not trust admins to make the right decisions anymore, and I will not forget what happened here. Thanks for taking the time to read my comments here and at AN. :) User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 19:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I wrote an essay a while ago, User:Tamzin/Guidance for editors with mental illnesses, which I should probably retitle, because it applies to all mental health considerations, not just diagnosable illnesses. At AN you mentioned brain fog, and here you're mentioning trauma-related anxieties (if that's an accurate paraphrase). I'd encourage you to take a look at what I've written there, particularly guiding principles one and two. If you feel you can't edit without raising your anxiety levels, hey, that's a situation I've been in, several times. Each time, I've stepped away for a while—sometimes for a few days, sometimes for a year or more—and always been the better for it. To be honest, I'd probably be indeffed by now if I hadn't taken those breaks when I needed to. Indeffed again, that is. I got that "criminal record" in 2012, when I was 16. Even with the indef reversed, for years I felt like it followed me around, the same anxiety you're describing. And you know what? In the end, it did not prevent 340 people from supporting me at RfA. So, I wouldn't worry too much about that. What matters is moving upwards and onwards. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 19:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the essay. To be honest, the brain fog was actually the result of digesting gluten a year ago, not realizing I was intolerant to it until the beginning of this year. User:HumanxAnthro ( Banjo x Kazooie ) 19:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-


 * BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
 * Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
 * Epicgenius with 1518 points
 * MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
 * BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
 * AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
 * Sammi Brie with 520 points
 * Unlimitedlead with 5 points

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
 * MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
 * MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
 * BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
 * Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
 * LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
 * MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
 * Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
 * 🇺🇦 Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DwightSchruteFaceMask.png
Thanks for uploading File:DwightSchruteFaceMask.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)