User talk:Humordog

This is the official Wiki concensus on the following: (see: Copyright 1.2) Linking to copyrighted works Since most recently-created works are copyrighted, almost any Wikipedia article which cites its sources will link to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain the permission of a copyright holder before linking to copyrighted material -- just as an author of a book does not need permission to cite someone else's work in their bibliography. Likewise, Wikipedia is not restricted to linking only to GFDL-free or open-source content.

So, please, further refrain from creating a User to vandalize a single page. Wiki is for public consumption.

btw - there is no such word as 'Copywritten' -- it would be copyrighted.

thank you,

Ydmyterko

REMINDER / WARNING2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Humordog, Humordog1, Humorous1..., Please cease and desist from vandalism of the page James Stacy Barbour. It is a belief that your continued editing is rooted in a Conflict of Interest/Biographies of living people. But all the content pertaining to Mr. Barbour's legal battles are linked to reputable publications (such as the New York Times and the Washington Post) and follows Verifiability rules. Again, Humordog cited "Correcting 'Copywritten'". Wikipedia's policy is: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is the official Wiki concensus on the following: (see: Copyright 1.2) Linking to copyrighted works Since most recently-created works are copyrighted, almost any Wikipedia article which cites its sources will link to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain the permission of a copyright holder before linking to copyrighted material -- just as an author of a book does not need permission to cite someone else's work in their bibliography. Likewise, Wikipedia is not restricted to linking only to GFDL-free or open-source content. So, please, further refrain from creating a User to vandalize a single page. Wiki is for public consumption.

I've permanently blocked your other accounts and blocked this one for 24 hours. When the block expires, please discuss changes rather than resorting to sockpuppetry. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)