User talk:Hungariae

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 11:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Good luck with your unblock request. Here at Wikipedia we rely solely on reliable sources and not personal knowledge, which is not acceptable, even if you're an expert. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting us know about the copyright violation, though; we'll have to look carefully at that. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 20:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The sources need to be with your changes, and if they are from your website, they are not reliable. Please read our guidelines before contributing further. -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 20:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * To clarify: the sources you have listed on your website may well be reliable and verifiable sources. But we can't just point to your website and say, "there are reliable sources here in this list." Rather, assertions in articles need to be associated with individual sources for verifiability. Otherwise, it's similar to just saying "it's a book I found in a library"; sure, a library has a lot of books; which particular book do we need to look at to verify this fact? --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 23:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)