User talk:Hungarian Phrasebook

DYK for Operation London Bridge
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Democratic Party leadership election, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Military College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jason Unruhe
Hello Hungarian Phrasebook. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jason Unruhe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''PROD has been contested by established editor, so possibly not uncontroversial. Use WP:AFD instead.''' Thank you.  So Why  07:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jason Unruhe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Parties
I agree with you that U.S. parties and Westminster parties are apples and oranges, and the party leader is a distinct position. However the other position are important enough to be in the infobox. Personally I think a good compromise would be to include the position of leader as the first position people see, and other positions below that less prominently. Charles lindberg (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

No, they're not party positions. They don't belong in the infobox since putting them there suggests otherwise and is therefore misleading. Why do you think those positions are not included in the UK party infoboxes? Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Concur. GoodDay (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Democratic Party
I just wanted to give you a heads up that I partially reverted one of the changes you made to the New Democratic Party article section on federal presidents. According to his article, Merv Johnson was a Member of Parliament, and never served in the Saskatchewan legislature. I think the mention of Saskatchewan was referring to where his federal riding was located, but since you thought it meant Saskatchewan legislature, it can be misleading. If you want to revert my edit, go ahead, it's no big deal. I just didn't want it to look like I was stepping on anyone here. Cmr08 (talk) 04:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Niki Ashton
It would be pretty fantastic if millions of women were indeed running for the NDP leadership. sikander (talk) 11:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Mifter (talk) 21:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

We should ask for bot help
Lots of pages with portal need a fix....Template talk:Portal--Moxy (talk) 16:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I don't know how to do that. Feel free. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 16:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ .Bot requests--Moxy (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Aboriginal or Indigenous
It seems that Indigenous is not the most popular choice among Inuit. I haven't checked with everybody but the people I asked felt that it referred more to First Nations. So it goes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Ever since the UN's Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007 there has been a shift in Canada away from the term Aboriginal and towards Indigenous among the communities involved. Part of this is political, in order to emphasise who in Canada the declaration applies to, part of it is lexicological as some feel that "Aboriginal" has negative connotations (usually people bring up the word "abnormal" as compared to "normal" that is if abnormal means something that isn't "normal", Aboriginal implies someone who isn't "original") so as a result of a growing preference among community leaders and community scholars the government recently renamed the federal department "Indigenous Affairs and Northern Development" and has increasingly adopted the term "Indigenous". Some bands may continue to prefer "Aboriginal", some may even continue to prefer the older term "Native" and you'll probably never get unanimity but I think there is a critical mass now for "Indigenous" as the preferred term, at least at present. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If I may, I've been keeping a watch on Hungarian Phrasebook's user talk page because I'm quite interested and supportive of what he's doing on this matter. I just went to the official webpage of the national organization Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and it does state: "Inuit are an Indigenous people...." Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Like I said just a small group that I asked. But certainly should be used here on Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join a discussion
Hi, I noticed you were involved in the debate over infobox ideology in the article Conservative Party of Canada. The page is currently locked because of an edit war, and no attempt has been made on the talk page to resolve this. I would to thus invite you to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Conservative_Party_of_Canada so the page can be unlocked and constructive editing can continue.--Jay942942 (talk) 15:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of CKUR-FM for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CKUR-FM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CKUR-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Come from Away
Please see Talk:Come from Away for ongoing discussion about the title of Come from Away. Before undertaking any page moves in the future, please check an article's talk page for prior or ongoing discussion. When in doubt, use the requested moves process to achieve consensus on the proposed title. Thanks, Ibadibam (talk) 06:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

List of current senators of Canada - "Upcoming retirements" section
Should the "Upcoming retirements" section be a table similar to the "Vacancies and pending appointments" section (and maybe follow directly after it?) instead of just a list? Seems like it has been expanding to be more table-like recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.103.152.52 (talk) 17:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Not every list needs to be a table. Nice to to have some variety rather than table after table after table on one page Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from New Democratic Party of Quebec into Parti de la Democratie Socialiste. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Billie Flynn


The article Billie Flynn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. 142.160.131.202 (talk) 03:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Billie Flynn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billie Flynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Billie Flynn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin J. Johnston for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin J. Johnston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin J. Johnston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 19:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Renaming categories
Please do not move category pages yourself, but make a proposal at WP:Categories for discussion.

Some moves that you made in 2017 are now being reversed, see ; Categories for discussion/Log/2019 February 18 re Category:Canadian Indigenous case law to Category:Canadian Aboriginal case law, etc. – Fayenatic  L ondon 17:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)