User talk:Huno61

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Kiichi nakamoto, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kiichi nakamoto


The article Kiichi Nakamoto has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Cannot place my article on Kiichi Nakamoto online

Please help me with...

Huno61 (talk) 22:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC) Huno61
 * Hi. Offline sources are okay to cite. See this page for an explanation on how to cite sources.  Because you've cited an offline source that appears, to me, to probably be reliable, I've removed the WP:BLPPROD tag, since that tag only applies to articles about living people that have no reliable sources at all.  Be advised, though, that the article could still be taken to WP:AFD and a discussion could decide to delete it for lack of notability.  You'll need to cite more reliable sources to show that Kiichi Nakamoto has been written about in depth in multiple reliable sources.  There is no set minimum, but at least 3 is a good general rule.  Cheers, Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 23:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)