User talk:Hunt 1030

Welcome!


Hello, Hunt 1030, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tutorial to help get you oriented editing Wikipedia)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Jim1138 (talk) 18:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Coleonyx variegatus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Coleonyx variegatus was changed by Hunt 1030 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930045 on 2015-05-06T17:53:27+00:00.

Coleonyx variegatus
I undid your edit to Coleonyx variegatus as you did not supply a source. The sources do not specify "under sprinkler covers". One source states " its tail is very rapidly regrown", but not how long regrowth takes. Please wp:cite wp:reliable sources (RS) supporting your content so that Wikipedia can be wp:verifiable (V). Use of your own knowledge is considered wp:original research and should be avoided as it is not verifiable. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 18:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)