User talk:HunterZone/Archive 3

Re:Article Checking
I made a couple of minor changes to Pakistan TC and tornadoes, which needs a better title IMO - Maybe something like list of extreme weather events in Pakistan - or maybe split the information of about tornadoes into an article about tornadoes in Pakistan (see if you can find some additional tornadoes in Pakistan via Google/Google Scholar). According to User:Hurricanehink, in the 1977 Oman Cyclone your conversions are slightly off as you need to round them to the nearest 5 and use MPH and KM/h not knots (just convert the knots using Google). Other than that both articles seem ok i would concentrate your efforts on trying to expand the 1977 oman cyclone.Jason Rees (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Anikingos/Pages and User:Anikingos, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Awwww, comeon you dont have to feel so sad, i see you have done that while you were copying codes to create your user page. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Notice
Thanks for that. I actually noticed it quite a long time ago, but i was feeling quite lazy to edit! --Anirudh Emani (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Red suffusion lovebird
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Red suffusion lovebird, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.africanlovebirdsociety.com/genetics/red.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Your additions to Red-suffusion Lovebird and Drought in Pakistan have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestions for "List of floods in Pakistan"
Here i am going to give you some suggestions regarding the article of List of floods in Pakistan.

First you can add the record river discharges from the website of Pakmet.com.pk. And you can add the new Section, "Record river discharges in Pakistan" and in this section you can highlight the 2010 floods, which equals and even surpasses those discharges which were recorded in 1990's floods which were the previous disastrous floods in the history of Pakistan.

Further more you can add some content regarding the list of floods which you have added in the section, " list of floods". Explain briefly each flood, that why they occurred and what destruction they causes. You can explain the two explanations for each flood.

In this respect you can find a lot of stuff from Pakmet.com.pk and search on net for the floods in Pakistan. The article in some way looks insufficient.

Regards.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 12:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

The suggestions which i have given are to the point and are precise too, so add the headings which i have mentioned above in a precise manner and to the point, do not add long detail, just explain briefly.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

welcome2
22:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)~

Salman Taseer
not sure abou tthis edit but for some reason it took out the proper cite. the format for citing on wikipedia avoid barelinks (hence the tag on the page).(Lihaas (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)).

Climate articles
Hello HunterZone! Your work on various city climate articles has been great and I was wondering if you would be looking forward to perhaps creating a similiar article for Climate in Faisalabad. Do let me know if you are interested and I might help out too; Mar4d (talk) 12:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It can be in whatever format you think is suitable :) Mar4d (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and the article looks great. Keep it up ;) Mar4d (talk) 14:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: How?
Are you talking about a particular time period or just a single storm? I would expand on this but I have to go. Just leave the specifics on my talk page and I'll get back to you when I have time. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Unusual landfalls of tropical cyclones

 * Someone (not I) nominated this one yesterday and it looks as if they didn't exercise the courtesy of telling you about it. I've taken care of admonishing them to be more considerate in the future.  Seems like a lot of this has to do with the title, and there are a lot of "define this, define that" arguments.  Anyway, it's not fair to you, although I think it's a new person who didn't know any better, rather than an intentional slight.  Mandsford 19:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Hworang


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Hworang. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Hwoarang. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hwoarang - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cntras (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)