User talk:Hunter Kahn/Archive 6

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Inauguration of Barack Obama FAC4
As the GA reviewer, you may want to comment. FAC4 is getting long in the tooth.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Peer review
I left comments regarding the Parks and Recreation article. Cheers. -- James26 (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

St. Valentine's Day (30 Rock)
Hey Hunter, yeah it's me again, sorry. I do really mean it. Listen, if time is available in your agenda, can you go over "St. Valentine's Day" and see if everything is in order? If time is not available, I totally understand. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No rush, really, I just want to see if I did good or not, so I could improve in the future. This is my first article expansion away from Will & Grace. Thank you... a lot... a whole lot. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  18:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking it over, I appreciate it. :) I've been debating whether or not to keep the phone call/prayer detail in the plot, part of me says to remove it, but the other part says to keep it because that part is mentioned in all of the episode reviews. Yeah, I'll cut the info. down in the Reception section, I had it like that cause I was in search of reviews. For examples I looked to past 30 Rock articles,  I looked at some W & G, and yes even Parks and Recreation. Do you think the Canning quote, the first one and the one you used as an example, would fit better with a quote box? Don't worry, I'll try to do my best with paraphrasing and include one review all together. I have a question, though, in mostly all the reviews everyone seemed "upset" over the whole McFlurry thing in the episode, many thought it was product placement, but Tina Fey said it wasn't, should I put this bit in the Reception? Anyway, thanks again for your help, I'll get right away and fix this. --  ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I "shortened" the quote, so. Alright, I'll add the McFlurry bit, along with Fey's respond to it. I worked on what you suggested, regarding the long quotes, yesterday, I hope I got it. Funny, I was gonna review a P & R article, as a thank you, but totally left my mind. Sure, I'll review one of them. Just let me review the articles I signed up to. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Mecha-Streisand
I've started a review on the article; though it isn't complete yet, come and address the issues. Cheers,  The Flash  I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 05:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I would like to deeply apologize for taking so long to respond. I've been a bit sidetracked lately, but I've finished the rest of the review. :)  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 20:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Brilliant, and I've responded. And, lol, thanks for signing my autograph book :)  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 23:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

GAN
I've replied. Thanks!-- Coldplay Expért Let's talk  02:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for passing the article! Dapi89 (talk) 13:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Dog Gone GAN
I've addressed your concerns. Gage (talk) 02:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Out of curiosity...
lol, Yeah, it was quite entertaining. I particularly enjoyed the sequence where Leslie gives dozens of stereotypical "women excuses" for how she "shot" Ron.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 19:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Good work
Thanks, Hunter! Now all I need to do is quit procrastinating and get those last four articles up, lol :P  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 03:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Why, I haven't seen a bunch of black kids like that get owned since the American Civil War!
You know, Big Gay Al's Big Gay Boat Ride should go through FAC too. Looks quite good; I would be able to give a better review if it was listed. Sceptre (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's a silly rule. It stops veteran writers like me and you to nominate... although, they may have a point if you're failing for prose... Sceptre (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Blake J. Robbins
I added the source. I am new to this process. Valhalla7 (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

SP13
I saw your note but I simply got busy and forgot to reply. Ideally, it would be best to copyedit each-other's prose as it would work as a quick PR. I will finish adding and trimming the episode plots this weekend. As for order, until now all of my season FLC noms had all the prose first and then the episodes. But recently there seems to have been a shift in that. I feel it will depend on where it goes: for FAC, a table might look better at the end; for FLC, at the beginning. Although it has 14 entries, the article seems to be heading towards FAC. Nevertheless, putting the table up might work just fine. I guess it will depend on what the reviewers say. Nergaal (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The more SP topics the better! As for FAC, the one nom per editor rule will probably slow things down to make GAN a much better and faster approach. Happy editing! Nergaal (talk) 20:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Cameron did not say anything about the smurfs episode? I looked around but could not dig anything. Nergaal (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I am done for now. I went through the text, and asides from a couple of typos everything looked fine. I did notice a few things that aren't yet covered in the text, which I have left as hidden comments in the respective section:

I also moved the episodes up as I've realized it makes the most sense that way (although right after production seemed fine also). Nergaal (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * writers: are the wrestling teacher, sally worth mentioning that they are introduced (albeit seemingly for 1 episode)? the section does need some notes on the parodies the episodes make: Avatar, LHC, WWE, 2012 paranoia, and perhaps even peeing in water parks
 * music: feels like it needs a note on the Jonas Brothers or the depiction of the crowds they get at the concerts
 * celebrities: James Cameron would be sweet

"Pawnee Zoo"
Just wanted to alert you that that episode's been nominated for a GLAAD Award. Cheers,  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 16:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Wanted to ask your opinion
I'm thinking of eventually nominating Naomi Clark for a GA review. It's recently been through the Peer Review process, and has improved as a result of some helpful comments. Since you've done some GA work via the Parks article, I was wondering if you noticed any issues with this one via a quick glance or two. I'm just wondering how close it is to being GA ready. I'd appreciate your time. -- James26 (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you being honest (believe me, I can handle criticism, lol). Thanks a lot for your helpful words. -- James26 (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey again. I don't know if I'm going to nominate it for GA, but do you know of anyone who simply assesses/grades TV-related articles? I left a request on Project Television months ago, but that Project doesn't seem very active. Kind of irks me that the Adrianna article has an assessment while this one doesn't. Just thought I'd see if you knew of anyone who I might refer it to. If not, no problem. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 22:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * To avoid any bias on my part, I'll just wait and let it be assessed by the Project or whatever. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 23:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

FAC
I understand your position, but I oppose primary sources for plots, and always will. Woogee (talk) 05:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm hoping others will agree with my position. Woogee (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be difficult. :) Woogee (talk) 05:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, if you can find a source ... :) Woogee (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Reliable sources have to be neutral third party sources. Woogee (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

No, everything else looked okay, it was just the plot section I had problems with. Woogee (talk) 06:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Good job, objection withdrawn. Woogee (talk) 07:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

VS Fashion Show
I will need the full 7 days to respond. I am already one GA review behind with Joe Cada and am trying to catch up with image licensing requests on my talk page (take a look).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

GA:RE
Rhode to Road has been done, jesus i working on it and i was just notified of not all dogs. -- Pedro J. the rookie 18:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Health care reform in the United States should be a Good Article
You mentioned that you were interested in promoting Good articles at WP:OBAMA, and this seems like an article which is well overdue for that status (and more). I haven't edited the article as of yet, but I was quite impressed with it. If you're interested I'm sure you could do much to help it on its way. Mike Serfas (talk) 02:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

GA Review opened
While I haven't actually done the review yet, just dropping a note that the GA review for Leslie's House is open. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Julie Benz on DH
Hi there. About Julie Benz and her guest sting on "Desperate Housewives", she was originally contracted for three episodes, and later four, as in her contract would be expanded. Meaning she can still be on more episodes, and I'm pretty sure she will be, since those first four episodes have been shot already (two have aired and one will air next week) and she is still promoting the series in talk shows and there has been no sign of her departure from the show's cast as of yet. Rumor has it she'll have a permanent role throughout the end of the season, and the casting call for that character specified she would appear in 5-7 episodes. Therefore I think we should keep the "string of guest appearances" instead of the "string of four guest appearances". - Renaboss (talk) 09:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

GANs
Hi Hunter... aww, you know I've done 'em before :) Sure, I'll happily take a look at both. How's your Wikicup entry going?  Arctic   Night  08:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sweetums GA nom on hold.  Arctic   Night  09:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Parks and Recreation (season 2) GA nom passed.  Arctic   Night  09:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I've got no issues with reviewing some next week. Taking a look at Sweetums now :) I've been working on a load of DYKs this week... so much that my DYK count is now up to 41. I've also been doing a bit of recent changes patrolling... now I've got Huggle, it's so fast!  Arctic   Night  11:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Hunter, actually, I do have a page to keep track of my hooks: see User:Arctic Night/DYK. It's also linked to in my new talk page header :) I really should update that page as I'm coming up to the 50 mark!  Arctic   Night  05:47, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Legally Blonde
Hi Hunter. I managed to sort alot of the stuff out and removed alot of unsourced material (alas, some of it has been added back in again without sources, what's a guy to do?!?!) and changed alot of things relating to the feedback but im so busy with Uni work at the moment I haven't really got time to follow it all up so might be best to fail it now and try again another day!! Thanks for all your help, im sure i'll have more time in the future to work on it.Mark E (talk) 18:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Check out
can you tell me if this artical is futre GA matiriaal. -- Pedro J. the rookie 23:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

GAC
Great work bud! There are only 2 minor issues to fix, before I pass it. It is probably FA ready too (more cup points) :) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 07:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Passed, let me know when you nominate more South Park episodes. FYI, (not sure if I said this before) but I really only like to review articles that I like the subject, so no on Parks and Rec. :) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 21:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * So, my boss told me on Monday to watch Butters' Bottom Bitch, I had forgotten about it till I saw your GAC...LMFAO! That episode was crazy great! Anyway, getting to the point, I'll review it tonight or tomorrow. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 02:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL, true, he is crazy...damn though, I'm a dork ;) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 02:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Just 2 very minor fixes are needed this time. Great job! C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 21:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure if you saw this post due to it not being at the bottom. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 03:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Just alt text too please :) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 04:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks bud....eh, it's Friday night, and I'm lame with no life sitting at home....might as well review W.T.F. too :) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 04:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the GAR, hope we can work again soon. -- Pedro J. the rookie 22:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter
Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to, our round one winner (1010 points), and to and , who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points),  claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and  claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

GAC 2
Should season 13 by a FLC instead of a GAC? The Simpsons seasons are FLs. C T J F 8 3 GoUSA 04:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess there is a lot more detail in that then in the Simpsons FL seasons. Ok, watch for the review of WTF, if your still up in less than 2 hours (Mc Donald's first) C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 04:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Couple minor things Talk:W.T.F./GA1 C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 06:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * WTF is good to go! C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 05:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It helps me a lot cause you know what you're doing and the reviews are cake. I'll get to Whale Whores soon...if you wanna do the alt text you can, or wait for the review. C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 05:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Talk:Whale Whores/GA1 done, one fix  C T J F 8 3  chat 04:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Odd, I searched google news, but all that came up was to pay for the article. Passing.  C T J F 8 3  chat 05:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Kissing
"Could the subject be adequately conveyed by text without using the non-free content at all?"

Yes, it is just two women kissing. You can't even see the faces.

I prefer not stealing. However, I don't want you to lose out for GA so I will not review the article. Good luck. Consider not stealing, if you have a legal excuse. Judith Merrick (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Victoria's Secret Fashion Show
I have responded to your concerns.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Television and radio drama? Unless there is some sort of fashion category.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for the barnstar! It is much appreciated. and as always I look forward to the next review! C T J F 8 3 chat 05:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, sounds good. Perhaps I'll expand my horizons and review more of your articles. Go for the win!  C T J F 8 3  chat 05:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

GANs
Hey, Hunter!

Thanks for your time, and I understand your problem. Basically, unlike Hollywood, film news articles are few mand far between - and those coming in newspapers (except The Hindu and Times of India and a couple more) don't seem to be to reliable either. I'll rank the following websites in reliability and write a bit about them.


 * Sify.com - Sify, like Rediff, is major player in the internet broadband market and dedicates it sown very reliable section to films.
 * BehindWoods.com - Behindwoods, is another leading Tamil film portal, based in America - very reliable.
 * IndiaGlitz.com - overviews Indian films as a whole
 * OneIndia.in - overviews Indian films as a whole

The rest are very here and there, though the fast two could pass for reliable.
 * Chennai 365
 * CineSouth.com
 * BharatStudent.com
 * OnionDosa.net

Thanks, and I'll try to improve the references of the concerning articles. Universal Hero (talk) 08:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm, I've been looking into it. I'll be updating the articles over the weekend - and will remove all "Oniondosa" and "bharatstudent" links definitely and will try to remove the other two dubious ones too. Universal Hero (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

P&E GANs
Hunter, I'm flattered you asked my opinion and I'd be more than happy to give the reviews a go. I have absolutely no idea how to go about something like that, but I'll take a crack at it if you'd like. I'll give the "How to" guide a read and then get my review up on one of the episodes A.S.A.P. Thanks again! SchrutedIt08 (talk) 07:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Peer review
You are very welcome - glad to help out, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Family Gay
Hey Hunter, while I appreciate the offer, I don't want it to seem like a COI, if you review my articles. User:Qst reviewed some of mine, and I reviewed some of his, and a user brought up the COI, which does make sense. I'm ok reviewing yours, I enjoy it. :)  C T J F 8 3  chat 18:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ya, I just don't want someone down the line saying, every article that Ctjf83 reviewed of Hunter Kahn, and vice versa needs reassessment. I think it would be ok for you to review Family Gay, because it is only one review, and it has been reviewed once and will be a breeze to go through.  C T J F 8 3  chat 19:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

RE:South Park
Hooray!! It was a pleasure collaborating with you.-- Music 26/  11  17:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Wrong article
Thanks for the Four Award, but I wrote and promoted Babakotia, not Bronwyn Bancroft. Thanks for the good laugh after a long day at work, though! :-) –   VisionHolder  «  talk  »  22:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Four Award
Good job! –  VisionHolder  «  talk  »  23:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Four Award
Again, good job! –  VisionHolder  «  talk  »  23:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Home Movies
Hiya, Hunter. I was wondering if you can see if you can find any ratings information (or any information at all) on Adult Swim's comedy Home Movies? In particular, reviews and ratings from the days when it was on UPN and the finale. Cheers,  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 23:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Just wondering, have you been able to find anything?  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 22:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, but just an update: I've just come across several Broadcast & Cable articles from '99 that have ratings info on almost all five of the series' original UPN episodes! (turns out they were way lower then I thought, lol) So, there's no rush for that info, I'm settled for now. Still, though, I'm a total n00b when it comes to ratings; I'm revising the pilot, so can you tell me if you know what a 1.4/2 Nielsen Rating translates to in numbers? Cheers,  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 01:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, well, I've finished the article—do you have time to review it at GAN?  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 21:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, I've taken care of all your concerns.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 02:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! And I'm reviewing South Park (season 13) as we speak.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 04:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Very, very sorry for taking so long to continue. I've raised some more concerns for you to take care of.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 02:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Awesome, I'll be sure to check it out in my review. :)  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 02:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Heads-up
I don't think a first round bust out is any different than any other tournament that he did not cash in. It is not worth mentioning, IMO.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * There aren't really any tournaments were I feel a non-cash finish is a necessary addition to an article for a player of his stature.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Parks and recreation pilot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Parks and recreation pilot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Homicide life on the street subway filming.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Homicide life on the street subway filming.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fleas (The Good Wife)
Hello! Your submission of Fleas (The Good Wife) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I happen to be a fan of "Star Trek"...if you really want to know.
I happen to be a fan of Star Trek...if you really want to know. That's why I compare episodes from another TV show with any of the Star Trek episodes of the same title. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 21:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Praise for Critical Reception Sections
I just wanted to extend some praise for your sectional work under Critical Reception in a series of Parks and Recreations articles.Obamafan70 (talk) 14:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

"Sexual Healing (South Park)"
Ratings info for it are out, just to let you know. BTW, I've passed season 13. Cheers,  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 23:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

"Lawn Gnome Beach Party of Terror"
Hey, Hunter. I just wanted to alert you that I've renominated the article for GAN, and as you promised a while back you'd be happy to review, I just wanted to inform you. Get to it whenever you feel like, I'm in no rush. :D  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 18:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Gossip (The Office) GAN: On hold
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I have reviewed the article, and have found a few issues that should be addressed before the article is passed. The review can be seen here. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, and an extension can be given if progress is being made. Good work on the article so far, and let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or when you are finished. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from SIMILARTREATMENTISVALID
Hello Hunter Kahn, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to SIMILARTREATMENTISVALID has been removed. It was removed by Mike Cline with the following edit summary ' (removed PROD and replaced with CSD A-10) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with Mike Cline before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 08:05, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Park Safety
Hello! Your submission of Park Safety at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 11:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Dances with Smurfs
Ah, thanks for explaining your edit. I just couldnt figure out why you would rvt yourself there. :P O well. Have a good one. :) Outback the koala (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:South Park Fishsticks Gay Fish.ogg
Thank you for uploading File:South Park Fishsticks Gay Fish.ogg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Park Safety
Hey Storye book. It seems resolving the Andy Samberg picture matter won't be an easy task, so I've just dropped the pic from the Park Safety article and DYK nom. Would you be willing to look at the DYK nom again now that it's gone? —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  21:59, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.--Storye book (talk) 07:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Genesis Awards
Hi, Hunter. I've updated "Whale Whores" with information on its nomination and subsequent defeat at the Genesis Awards this year, but the season page itself needs to be updated with this info.  The Flash  I am Jack's   complete   lack of surprise 16:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Apologies
It was sloppy of me to refer to Parks and Recreation (season 1) as "unimportant" in the FAC discussion—particularly as I'm the primary author of a certain featured article that gets fewer than ten hits per month. I was trying to make a point about how professional style varies quite widely from topic to topic, and messed up. I do think the article is in fine shape, and I hope it passes. All the best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I left a reply at User talk:Steve. All the best, Steve  T • C 15:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter
We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of How About a Friendly Shrink?
The article How About a Friendly Shrink? you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:How About a Friendly Shrink? for things which need to be addressed.  The left orium  13:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If the date at User:Hunter Kahn is correct, happy birthday!  The left orium  14:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Herman Lamm
Hi, Sorry about not citing the Lamm info. I've never posted on Wikipedia before and was still in the process of trying to figure out how to do citations. I should have practiced on that before posting changes. The birth date and place of Lamm is documented on his WW1 draft registration card filled out June 5, 1917 while he was in jail in Utah. This is a public record. His conviction for Grand Larceny is public record from the Utah State Prison. The cause of death is the official report of the coroner's jury in Sidell, Ill. This is documented in several newspapers. There are conflicting claims in other newspaper accounts, but the official coroner's jury report is self-inflicted wounds. I have to dig out the newspaper stories that cite that. There is actually a great deal I can and will add, but I will need to take time and learn the Wikipedia system first. Paul Peterson Thosepoliticos (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Nidal Malik Hasan
Hi -- as to your latest change at Nidal Malik Hasan, I don't see any consensus at the talk page supporting it (though I do see consensus to reflect it somewhere in the lede). Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)