User talk:Hunter Kahn/Archive 9

Laserblast
Started the review here. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * O.k, I have passed Laserblast for Good Article. Also, are you making anymore movies from Mystery Science Theater 3000? It was a fun read. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It was fun to watch, like any other MST3K episode. However, after watching, I wasn't ready for some football anymore. GamerPro64 (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010
The article United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:United States Senate Democratic primary election in Pennsylvania, 2010 for things which need to be addressed. Lord Roem (talk) 23:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I posted my final comments. If you can't find another source for the 'results' section, it will make me sad but won't kill the GA :D - just tell me when you're done and I'll give the article a final review before going down the checklist. Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 23:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

WebCite
Hello and Happy New Year! I wanted to let you know that if you are going to reference websites that may go dead in the future, you can use WebCite to create an archived page. You can add the feature as a bookmark so when you're at a page you want to archive, you can select the bookmark to perform the process. You can use the  parameter to include the link. For example, I did this at Alex Tse. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 20:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Reporting user IP vandal
Hey dude, what's the page to report a repeat IP vandal? - Areaseven (talk) 02:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:ANV C T J F 8 3  chat 02:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * lol Thanks CTJF! 03:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hero Fiennes-Tiffin in Harry Potter preview.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hero Fiennes-Tiffin in Harry Potter preview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Well deserved

 * I second to that. I congratulate you for the patience you had. I was away over the break and I did not have a chance to do any edits. But seeing the drama around it, I don't know if I would have had the drive you had with it. Great job and keep the energy going for more great articles! Nergaal (talk) 01:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Into Temptation
Hi, Hunter. I'll be happy to take a look over the next few days. DocKino (talk) 06:45, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South Park episodes
Template:South Park episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Sister Wives GA Review
Hi Hunter Kahn,

I've begun a review of Sister Wives, which you nominated for GA class. The article looks good and probably will pass but there are a few minor issues to fix before promotion. You can follow the review on this page:Talk:Sister Wives/GA1. Well done on all your work so far. Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 22:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It passed! Well done! Best, --Ktlynch (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles B. Pierce
The article Charles B. Pierce you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Charles B. Pierce for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Parks and recreation go big or go home.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parks and recreation go big or go home.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassadors
I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Homicide articles
Hey man, how's it going? Did you get your book finished? Just saw another Homicide article listed at GAN and I noticed that most of the sources used don't have URLs associated with them, so I presume they're not online. I was hoping you could tell me where and how you get your sources from for such old episodes (1980s/90s). Best, Matthewedwards : Chat  19:40, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) I took a look at what my library offers. No Newsbank or Lexis, but I have access to Proquest and EBSCO, which have quite a few newspaper and magazines. Matthewedwards : Chat  05:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

WP:TVE assessments
Yeah I'll give it my best shot. Just tell me what I need to do :) SchrutedIt08 (talk) 04:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Resources
Do you have access to LexisNexis? If so, is it the same as this LexisNexis?  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  05:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Go Big or Go Home
Hey... glad we found a hook :) Go ahead and mention the Sep->Jan delay in the article lead, and ref it there too; then we'll get this thing a tick! You may want to go to GA with the article too...its pretty well-written! Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Go Big or Go Home
Thank you Victuallers (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to, who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by , with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to, who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, , who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Flu Season (Parks and Recreation)
Hey again :) I suggested and ALT, and ref the lead so nobody fusses at me for tickin'...! Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Just for the sake of those DYK rule police out there, throw a ref at the end of each lead paragraph :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Worst Films (again)
Sorry to bother you on your talk page. The consensus at Talk:List_of_films_considered_the_worst seems to be in favor of your proposal to change the categories to a chronological order. Would you like to make this change, or would you prefer that I do so. Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Parks and Rec
Thanks for the compliment on the Parks and Rec article, Hunter. I even mentioned you in the comment, going, "Where is the usual awesome editor??" But you came through soon after. Your edits were fantastic and I don't mind them at all. I actually entered like 95% of the quotes on the wikiquote article for this show if you want to check 'em out (limiting two per 1/2 hour episode is a tough rule to follow). I tend to edit anonymously, but my work IP was blocked due to the actions of others in my office. --Oodus —Preceding undated comment added 20:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC).

Time Capsule (Parks and Recreation)
I nominated Time Capsule (Parks and Recreation) for a DYK here. If that was wrong please retract it. cheers--Guerillero &#124; My Talk   06:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Flu Season (Parks and Recreation)
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:HORROR
Hello there, Hunter Kahn. I have noticed that you've made two horror-related article into Good Articles, with another one at GAN. Would you be interested in joining the Horror WikiProject? If you want to, please and your name here. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. I'll look at the article later this week. Thanks for letting me sign your guestbook. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of See No Evil (Homicide: Life on the Street)
Hello! Your submission of See No Evil (Homicide: Life on the Street) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 17:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Night of the Blood Beast
r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 18:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for See No Evil (Homicide: Life on the Street)
Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Time Capsule (Parks and Recreation)
Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, congratulations--and I was trying to catch up with you! Drmies (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Black and Blue (Homicide: Life on the Street)
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Well thanks!
Well gosh, thanks! I think this is just the thing to put a stop to the tumbleweeds blowing around my barnstar page. I have to be honest though, you probably have something coming your way too in the very near future...--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ron & Tammy: Part Two
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Homicide: Life on the Street (season 2)
Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away
 WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Media Blitz
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Indianapolis
I saw that also and they were totally right. I attempted to format it like you did, but gave up and just kept the plot summary in, thinking it'd be improved upon by someone eventually (no rush since no new ep until 3/17). I too noticed they preserved the plot, but feel free to write your own if you want - I don't want to be hoggin' the plot writin'. Oodus —Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC).

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to (first, with 487 points) and  (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

The Scarlet Letter
Can you help us with this The Scarlet Letter??--Kekkomereq4 (talk) 07:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I and another user to remove the movie, an IP have also removed the movie. The user Iamtorgo to leave the film. --Kekkomereq4 (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Question
No, that's my brother. Why? IamTorgo (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mst3k incredible melting man.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mst3k incredible melting man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Incredible Melting Man
The GA review of "The Incredible Melting Man" has determined the article does not meet the standards to pass at this time. It is suggested that assistance from Project Fim editors could help.--Amadscientist (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * A quick-fail is when a reviewer fails an article for one of the listed reasons without extensive review. I gave a complete review of the article. Wikipedia good article guidelines state:
 * Read the whole article, and decide whether it should pass or fail based on the criteria listed here. You can also put the article "on hold" or ask for a second opinion. If you wish, you can inform the nominator of your actions.


 * I chose to fail the article based on the amount of work that I precieved was needed and the need for added input from other editors to help. Basic guidelines of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog state: if the article is not of Good Article quality yet, don't be afraid to fail. I am an editor that will fail a nomination if I believe the work will take more than the time of a hold or there may be difficulties in the editor or editors understanding of MoS. I do indeed have the right to list "The Incredible Melting Man" as one of my reviews. I also do understand that it is your right to submit to Wikipedia:Good article reassessment. I do however, believe you misinterpretation of a "Quick fail" is illustrative of you misunderstanding of guidelines. No offense. I can always add more detail and or examples if you truely do not see what wikilinks should be added. While I did not speak to specifics on that I did believe the guidance was enough. You didn't even wikilink "Science Fiction" in your lede.--Amadscientist (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

My compliments on the improvements you have made! I will respond in more detail in the next few days. Geometry guy 01:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Don't touch my junk
I prod'ed "Don't touch my junk", which you once defended. I wrote on the talk page my reasoning. If you disagree strongly enough, feel free to remove the prod for the time-being. But I think it would be helpful to have more opinions. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree so I changed things to AfD instead of prod. Both ways seem okay. Jason Quinn (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

iCarly episodes
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:10, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Homicide: Life on the Street)
The article Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Homicide: Life on the Street) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Smoke Gets in Your Eyes (Homicide: Life on the Street) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK Life on the Streets
Your nomination needs a footnote next to the DYK fact in the article. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 04:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Night of the Dead Living
The article Night of the Dead Living you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Night of the Dead Living for eventual comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE  X  01:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

South Park: BLU GAR
Remember me? It's Railer-man. I nominated South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut for Good article status, but it didn't meet the criteria at the time. The article has been significantly been improved since that time, so I've placed up for reassessment at the talk page. Please take your time. Thanks! Railer-man (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1)
The article Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Homicide: Life on the Street (season 1) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE  X  17:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I know the assumption is to cite 'refutable' or 'controversial' material, but in the lead you mention opinions on the series, and although you make citations for those later in the article, just citing those same sources in the lead as well would avoid having it look weasel-wordy or un-sourced. Just reference the same sources you use further in the article in the lead as well and it'll be pretty much perfect. GRAPPLE   X  02:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks perfect to me now. I think you could get it featured without too much work, to be honest. GRAPPLE   X  12:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)