User talk:Hunterm267/Archive 1

Photon Engineering
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Photon Engineering, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.photonics.com/Company.aspx?CompanyID=11698.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

"notability not proven"
Hello. Please explain why a full professor of a university is not notable. Please read the links provided in the article, before putting a CSD on it. :) --SDKmac (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

—I would argue that with the given references the subject is not notable enough to warrent a wikipedia article on them, however, as I am relatively new to the Wikipedia scene, I have no objection to the removal of the CSD.--Hunterm267''Talk 18:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * That's ok. :) We have written the article simultaneously in German and English in a little article writing session. So now there is a (longer) article in German, too, with more sources and references which could be added to the EN article (if necessary). --SDKmac (talk) 18:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Attention
-Please read this article that describe's Wikipedia's notability on persons. Hope this helps. --Hunterm267''Talk 18:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Photon Engineering
Hello Hunterm267,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Photon Engineering for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Over hasty speedy delete nomination
I, you nominated Azad Kavi for speedy delete, but you only waited 3 minutes, The writer may have intended to add content. For this, please wait a olonger time, such as an hour before placing A1, A3 or A7 speedy delete reasons. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Graeme, my apologies for the haste. Upon checking the page to see if I specifically remember that instance, it would seem that it has already been deleted. I joined Wikipedia just a few days ago and am really enjoying helping with new page patrol, so I thank you for taking the time to inform me of my haste. I will try hard to do better to better help the community. --Hunterm267''Talk 15:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the review
I just finished creating my first article on Wikipedia, when I saw the notification that you had reviewed it. I appreciate the speedy review and am glad that my first article is good enough to stay on the site. Jionunez (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kaustubh Khade, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Photon Engineering for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Photon Engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Photon Engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Walton (talk) 09:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Photon Engineering Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Photon Engineering Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)