User talk:Huntersfield

Huntersfield Equestrian Centre
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Huntersfield Equestrian Centre, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.linkedin.com/companies/huntersfield-equestrian-centre. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Huntersfield Equestrian Centre
A tag has been placed on Huntersfield Equestrian Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I wanted to be sure you understood that the reason I deleted the material at Huntersfield Equestrian Centre was not concerned with the copyright status; in fact, I accepted the assertion you made on the associated talk page that you were the owner of the copyright. However, notwithstanding that, I found two significant problems with the article that led me to delete it.  One was that it seemed to me to be very much advertising; there were a number of glowing statements about the excellence of the institution in question that were unverified by any reliable sources, and attempts being made to use Wikipedia to drive traffic to the institution.  Similarly, there did not seem to be any assertion of notability; there was no reason for anyone to believe that the institution was in any way better, more noteworthy or special or unusual than its peers.  It's for those reasons that I deleted the article.  Notability, reliable sources and verifiability are three crucial elements of every Wikipedia article and what I saw had paid no attention to any of those concepts.  You can learn more about this by following the links in this paragraph, or by reading WP:Why was my article deleted?, or by leaving me a note if you're still uncertain after following those avenues.  Best of luck with your future contributions.  Accounting4Taste: talk 21:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Given your user name, I'd also suggest that you have a look at our conflict of interest policies. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note, which I moved to a more useful location on my talk page (found by clicking on the word "talk" after my signature). No apology is required; hundreds of people every day attempt to contribute articles to Wikipedia without a good understanding of our underlying policies, and I have no trouble accepting that your motivations were of the highest desire to inform others.  If you believe that the institution in question is indeed notable according to our definitions, and can provide reliable sources to back that up, there are a number of ways in which you can access help to create or re-create that article; at the top of this page, I will insert a "welcome" message that contains many of them.  You can also leave me a note if you have any further questions.  Best of luck with your future contributions.  Accounting4Taste: talk 21:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)