User talk:Huntingleaf

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capilano River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Vancouver ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Capilano_River check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Capilano_River?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Fixed it -- thank you for pointing this out Huntingleaf (talk) 19:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Huntingleaf.png
Thanks for uploading File:Huntingleaf.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Dorchester Review in Chapters, Calgary, 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dorchester Review in Chapters, Calgary, 2013.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello Huntingleaf. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to The Dorchester Review, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Huntingleaf. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. On File:Dorchester Review in Chapters, Calgary, 2013.jpg, you stated "Photo taken by a subscriber with his camera and sent to us to use freely and without reservation. There are no issues with usage of this photo." Whpq (talk) 17:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

REPLY to Whpq : Not sure where you are getting this idea (fervent imagination?). As far as I am aware, The Dorchester Review is published by a non-profit Canadian Revenue Agency-registered charitable foundation. My interest is to ensure accuracy and to ensure that the page is not abused by people with political motives, disclosed or undisclosed, or by jealous academics from the swamp of the publishing tortoise race. The photo attributed to a "subscriber" was sent in to the editors -- that is all I know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huntingleaf (talk • contribs)
 * The file description you added specifically uses the wording "sent to us". "Us" is an inclusive pronoun that includes you. -- Whpq (talk) 14:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

REPLY to Whpq : I see yes looks as if I copied and pasted that but I can't find the original. What's your interest? Huntingleaf (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

"Semi-popular"
This is a nonsense word. Take it to the talk page of the article to discuss whether or not you have third party reference sources that use that descriptor for the magazine. Your personal opinion doesn't count here. Risker (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Reply: You are wrong. It is a word in almost every dictionary. https://results.searchlock.com/search/?q=%22semi-popular%22%20dictionary%20%22semi-popular%22&sr=sb-serp&slr=1&chnm=store

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Dorchester Review, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)