User talk:Huntyrdave

Speedy deletion of The resigned
A tag has been placed on The resigned, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. NAHID 11:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


 * You recreated the article with nothing but a hangon tag on it. If you disagree with the deletion, please go to WP:DRV and nominate it there for an undeletion discussion.  But please note that the band must meet the guidelines at WP:BAND or it will be unlikely to be undeleted.  "Up and coming" bands are rarely kept, as they rarely meet the guidelines.  Corvus cornix 20:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

You asked:
 * yes i understand that wikipedia is not a place for advertising but is it not a place for information? I  also apologies that it had very little content but i intended to finish it now as i had to leave promptly before.Also around London the band are notable at the moment and should be supporting some big names with thier new songs which are being released today. I am not a band member myself and believe myself to be impartial so i would like to know how i could recover some of the information i wrote that was acceptable to do it again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Huntyrdave (talk • contribs) 20:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

In general, if a band is "up and coming", that means it isn't notable yet. To be notable, a band should be covered by reliable sources that are independent of the subject itself. If their new songs are being released today, then they most likely haven't been covered in the media yet. See the page WP:BAND for more information. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:50, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Osterley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 14:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Osterley, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 14:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Osterley, you will be blocked from editing. &mdash; Indon ( reply ) &mdash; 14:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Jarret reddick.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jarret reddick.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)