User talk:Huo Xin

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC 21:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Inappropriate removal of signatures
Please do not remove the signatures of other editors, as you did here. The removal of 155.245.123.127's signature made it appear as though Jaotsu made the post rather than 155.245.123.127. Thank you. -- Kittlesworthme (talk) 16:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do not edit the posts of others, as you did here. While minor corrections to the posts of others may be OK, 155.245.123.127 is allowed to express their thoughts as they choose. Thank you. Kittlesworthme (talk) 16:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Here, you edited Jaotsu's post and changed the context intended by Jaotsu. Please do not edit the posts of others. Kittlesworthme (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Jaotsu and Huo Xin are the same person. Sorry for the confusion. Huo Xin (talk) 02:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Adding your name in place of anothers
Please do not add your name in place of anothers in their signature as you did here to 128.32.147.171's signature. Thank you. Kittlesworthme (talk) 17:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC) Actually I forgot to login. Huo Xin (talk) 02:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Shaolin Mizong Style
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shaolin Mizong Style, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Shaolin Mizong Style appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shaolin Mizong Style has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Guest9999 (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Cai li fo
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Abce2 | Access  Denied  02:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

What a sec
I'm talking about delete the "Talk' Page, not the article.-- Abce2 | Access  Denied  02:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Hopefully the page won't get deleted.
I created a talk page. Huo Xin (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Jeong Yim
Many parts of this article (in fact, entire sections) are repeated verbatim. Can you please delete the excess wording? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Choi Lei Fut
Hello Huo Xin, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Choi Lei Fut - a page you tagged - because: '''The reason given is not a valid CSD criteria. If you feel that the article has been more appropriately written elsewhere, please merge and redirect the article to there.''' Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW ( Talk ) 20:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeong Yim


The article Jeong Yim has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Reads like an essay, laden with original research, unverified.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Huo Xin for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I got the following message from Beeblebrox following the Closing of the Case and thought I'd share it with you. Since you ARE the puppet master. He also informed me that once the case is closed, you can remove the template from the user page. I discovered that the sock puppet categories at the bottom of the page go away with the removal of the template. Clftruthseeking (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

It seems I was mistaken, have a beer and a slice on me. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem Beeblebrox! Let me know where to send my pizza and beer bill! j.k... Huo Xin (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Sockpuppet-fishy.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sockpuppet-fishy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 01:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Great work!
Check out this template, WikiProject_Martial_arts, too. Clftruthseeking (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Details on how to Reference in Articles
Good information and explanation of why references should be placed throughout an article.

User_talk:Janggeom

Clftruthseeking (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Martial Arts WikiProject Participants
Hello, please add your name to the list of active WPMA participants if you are participating. Thanks for your work so far. Janggeom (talk) 00:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Jeung Yim
Hello Huo Xin, thank you for your note about the Jeung Yim article. Please note that placement of a notability tag on an article is not a threat of sudden deletion; it simply indicates that the article's notability may be questioned, and the main implication is that the article needs to establish the subject's notability more clearly. In my comment when I placed the notability tag, I suggested that rephrasing the paragraph might be an option. While it might be true that a subject is not well documented, putting emphasis on this in the article's lead section will naturally lead other Wikipedia contributors to ask why the article is there (since notability is a key requirement for all Wikipedia articles). One suggestion I might make to you is that it is better to start small and build up from there; better to have less information, but to have it reliably sourced, than to put in a whole lot of information without reliable sources—you might know (or believe) the information to be accurate, but without reliable sources, others have no way of knowing (and so they will be more likely to challenge or remove it). Trust this helps. Janggeom (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bak sing


The article Bak sing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Bak sing – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jmcw (talk) 22:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ChanHeung.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ChanHeung.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ChanHeung.png
A tag has been placed on File:ChanHeung.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Lau Gar
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lau Gar, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?t=45082, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lau Gar and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Lau Gar, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lau Gar with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lau Gar. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Lau Gar saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Kevin (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lau Gar


A tag has been placed on Lau Gar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Cai Li Fo
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cai Li Fo, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://kungfucertificate.com/Bird_Form_Kung_Fu.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cai Li Fo and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Cai Li Fo, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Cai Li Fo with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cai Li Fo. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Cai Li Fo saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TexasAndroid (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Analysis by an independent admin has declared that this is a case of reverse copyright violation. - TexasAndroid (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Jeong Yim
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jeong Yim, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://kungfucertificate.com/Bird_Form_Kung_Fu.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jeong Yim and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jeong Yim, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jeong Yim with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jeong Yim. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Jeong Yim saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TexasAndroid (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Analysis by an independent admin has declared that this is a case of reverse copyright violation. - TexasAndroid (talk) 19:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

CCI Notice
Hello, Huo Xin. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. TexasAndroid (talk) 14:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Case withdrawn. "Violations" were a combination of reverse copyright violations and one inadvertent violation. - TexasAndroid (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Cai Li Fo and Jeong Yim pages
I and another editor have discussed with TexasAndroid who placed this block on this page and have demostrated that it is not a copyright issue, but rather a reverse copyright issue. We have given evidence and awaiting for an admin to unblock these pages. I have sent messages to 3 wiki admins requesting external assistance to see if we can get this issue resolved quickly. Huo Xin (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Apology
The two pages that I specifically flagged as copyvios have been officially judged as cases of reverse violation. Just as you have been saying. I am very sorry for my incorrect accusation in this situation, and apologize for doing so. - TexasAndroid (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Shaolin Mizong Style
The above (deleted) article was one of the articles I based my copyvio accusations on. Since the other four violations have turned out to be either reverse violations or inadvertent violation, I was wondering if you wanted this G12 deletion reexamined at this time. - TexasAndroid (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi TexasAndroid, it's been a really long time since I've been really active on Wiki, and I don't remember when I worked on that page - it seems like years ago, but the deletion is fine. Once I find more time, I'll start to work on them again. Thanks! Huo Xin (talk) 02:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I just looked at that page and it might be another reverse copyright violation. There are so many martial arts sites that just take content that we work on.  I wish there were some way of tagging it so that if people do copy it, there can be some embedded code that will prove it was taken from the wiki.  I'll have to think of some mechanism.  If you can think of a way, let me know.  It would sure be helpful!  Huo Xin (talk) 02:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm skeptical of reverse violation on this one, simply because of the time-line. It was posted by you on 5/18/09, and deleted as a violation on the same day.  That's not enough time for a reverse violation, I would think.  From the deletion comment, it was supposedly a copy of  and .  Figuring out exactly what did happen may be tricky at this late date.  One of the supposed source pages is no longer active, and there's no way of knowing if the other still looks at all like it did two years ago.
 * You can stick all sorts of things in page comments, but since the wiki page is ultimately just text, there's no way to prevent a site from striping out anything that is placed in. Also, there's a good chance that anything placed in comments for such purposes would be deleted *here*.  Such watermarking is not really in line with normal WP practices.  And keep in mind that copying from here is not the problem.  Mirror sites abound, and are welcome.  It's when copying happens without proper attribution back to WP that there is reverse violation.  - TexasAndroid (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ChanHeung.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChanHeung.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 18:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)