User talk:Huon/Archive14

SPI?
You blockedUser:Peachey Deen and User:Uwfaprez. We still have User:Stopphippo and User:Nectarine Dean. I see you blocked User:Dean of Nectarines also. Is an SPI worthwhile? CU would also show sleepers. Thanks, I saw this going on earlier today but was going out so didn't do anything then. Dougweller (talk) 15:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I wasn't even aware of User:Nectarine Dean and had assumed User:Stopphippo to be abandoned. There's also User:WindyPegg still unblocked, and Sockpuppet investigations/WindyPegg. That should suffice, I'd say. Huon (talk) 15:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I think I'll leave the unblocked ones unblocked and just keep an eye on them - unless they get out of hand. SPI should get them. Dougweller (talk) 16:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy 2015
Dear Huon, May this new year bring you a measure of tranquility and a good deal of happiness...yours is a challenging life and I think of you often and wish you well.Miramaribelle (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Taco Bell logo 2012.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Taco Bell logo 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the help. Erik L&#39;Ensle :) (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Scottish art in the eighteenth century
I could've sworn I put that in. Thanks for finding my oversight. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:10, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * My pleasure. Thanks for tidying up the references in the first place. Huon (talk) 17:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Very tidy now, I think. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:57, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Apparently I transgressed. Talk:Scottish art in the eighteenth century. I thought I would get strokes, not pokes. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 20:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * While I agree with you on the issues, I don't think the snark is necessary or beneficial here. Huon (talk) 20:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Accidentally made correction/addition, without logging in
Hello Huon,

It's been a bit...but I am back at your doorstep. Would you be able to remove, or tell me how to removed an entry I made where my IP address is showing, I thought I had removed it, but it is still there. I need your guidance/expertise in this area. If you are not aware how...will you direct me possibly to someone who may know.

I feel this a threat to my security...PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME...Thank you so very much for your time once again.

Hope you are well... Jess

PoekneegurlPoekneegurl (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * ✅ You cannot remove that; doing so requires revision deletion, available only to admins. See WP:Revision deletion. Huon (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Editing while logged out[edit]
 * For future reference:

Shortcuts: WP:LOGGEDOUT WP:LOUT Occasionally an established editor will edit while logged out. While not usually an egregious issue, there can be some concerns about attribution and privacy. If you made an edit without logging in, you cannot go back and directly tie that edit to your account. If your desire to account for the edit overrides your desire for anonymity, you can log in, make a dummy edit, and add a note in the edit summary about the previous edit. If you make a comment on a talk page without logging in, then your signature will include your IP address. You can log in and edit the comment by replacing the signature; be aware that the WikiScanner tool will retrieve these actions from the database and record them at the Poor Man's Checkuser,[dead link] thus connecting your username and IP address. If you feel that the connection between the IP address and your username is an issue, then you can request that the edit be removed; see Oversight and Requests for oversight. In Firefox (with the Greasemonkey add-on) or in Chrome, you can install a simple script that prevents editing while logged out on all Wikimedia Foundation sites. Once the script is installed and you click on Edit while logged out, it pops up a notice that you are not logged in and does not proceed. Note that it does not yet prevent editing by clicking on red links or by direct links to edit pages. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 19:44, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Ouch. I should have remembered that privacy concerns justify more severe measures; sorry. Revision deletion will hide the IP address from everybody but administrators; oversight is far more restrictive, only available to the most trusted members of the community (at most a few dozen people compared to roughly 1,300 admins), and will hide the address even from "regular" admins like me. I have asked Guerillero for help, and he has oversighted it. Huon (talk) 21:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Huon, That was not intended to be a criticism, so please don't read it as such. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 21:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't read that as criticism; thanks for reminding me. My comment was primarily directed at Poekneegurl whom I had given incorrect advice. But everything should be resolved now. Huon (talk) 22:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

✅ <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 17:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Percy Fletcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drury Lane Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
I am not a sockpuppet--Article contribute (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I am not a sockpuppet either. Your accusation was inappropriate. I don't want to assume motive, but it certainly *seems* petty and mean-spirited.Topdog76 (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Message from Borntorock
Stop posting on my page and leave me alone! Your spam and harsment is not appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borntorock (talk • contribs) 23:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * As you wish; should I ever again nominate an article you wrote for deletion I'll try to remember not to let you know. Huon (talk) 23:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

AMS (clothing)
Good morninig, I'd read your delation adivise, I I just do not understand the reasons, I think I've met all the criteria? If not, please help me understand where I went wrong, and if possible to help me to change it, thanks!

Usually I write and I contribute to improve wikipedia, and I have many items in, that have never had any problems. I waiting soon for a kind replay Thank a lot and best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio Pasquinelli (talk • contribs) 11:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The criteria I do not think the article meets are notability and a neutral point of view. Notability is easier to explain but probably harder to resolve: No reliable sources seem to have written about this company in any detail. Next to nothing of the article's content is based on independent coverage, and my attempts to find better sources failed utterly. I do not think that's salvageable right now; it seems it's too soon to have an article about them. That brings us to the other issue: The blatantly promotional tone. It "will become an important actor on the stage of African football and as a serious and reliable partner, and snatch a significant share of the local market, and on the global sportswear stage at the near future"? Really? Says who, except themselves? That is not a neutral statement, and it's not the only grandiose claim of imminent future success in that article. Let's wait until they have snatched a significant share on the global sportswear market. Huon (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

protection on 2014 indo pak skrimishes
I wanted to tell you that since you have protected the article. I would like to know why was mohitsingh allowed to edit the page. He gave a wrong information which is not even accepted by both sides (Pakistan and India). He also didn't give any reference of from where he got the info. So can you kindly remove the losses of 10 Pakistani soldiers which wrote in Pakistani casualities. Or revert the article to how it was before Zerefx (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Any autoconfirmed editor can edit that article. Mohitsingh is autoconfirmed, and I believe you are now too (or will be within minutes). But be careful to discuss disagreements on the talk page of the article, rather than risking an edit war.


 * Although it's good that you are using edit summaries, I find edit summaries like the following to be concerning: "I included Pakistan victory. Since Indian invasion was halted so it was Pakistan's victory". This indicates that you are drawing your own conclusions as to the significance of the outcome, rather than relying on what independent reliable sources say about it. This is actually quite common for battle outcomes on Wikipedia, but it is not good because it is original research. It can be especially problematic in controversial articles. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

User:Demiurge1000 Yes i did it, and it was wrong i just came to the conclusion i didn't write it out of my personal gurdge or wanted war or any thing like that. Still thanks for allowing me to edit on 2014 indo pak skrimishes. Zerefx (talk) 02:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: Your Edit on "I am Innocent"
1. Thank you for the message

2. Should I prepare to appeal the block, or is this just a warning?

3. Is it possible to change a password? Erik L&#39;Ensle :) (talk) 17:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Since you could edit my talk page, you're obviously not blocked yet, so there's no need to appeal. It is indeed possible to change the password; see Special:ChangePassword. Huon (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Judge Alonzo Conant.jpg
Can you undelete the high res version you deleted earlier today. From the message on my talk page it would appear that the daughter inherited the copyright on the death of her mother, who took the image,and that pd-self is therefore applicable. if you'll restore the image I'll deal with the licencing and getting the explanation onto the talk page. Thanks. Nthep (talk) 20:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * ✅ Huon (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Telenyem Renner Ikuru


Hello Huon. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Telenyem Renner Ikuru".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. st170etalk 20:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Later Sui Empire
Why is it labeled Hoax? The article have much number of legal references and text. Please read the references. Please reconsiders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ADHZ07111989 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)


 * It sure has references, and the main one is a wiki on alternate history - as in, "this didn't really happen". It would have been news to the Ming that someone else was operating an empire from their own capital. Huon (talk) 19:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

How about if I removed the wikia? And please look another page on the wikia it is not absolutely hoax since anther topic is also appear at the wikia and considered facts.ADHZ07111989 (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Removing the link wouldn't miraculously mean this made-up empire really existed. I have no idea what you're up to, but Wikipedia is not the place for it. Huon (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

What if the another references outsite wikia use as references and sources? I have legal and authentic text at hand (computer) so did the online version.

Can the article be recreate? Please support this since I use many another autthentic text and legal books (more than one text or book), disregard wikia.

Take a look at the wikia that another article have some contra interest from hoax label or hoax minded. That will work? How the solution? I really want to create this article. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 09:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Houn at “Dương Dynasty (An Nam)“
Thank, but I didn't found any cite, spelling, or grammar error. Please removed the issue. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ADHZ07111989 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I may do some copyediting later, but right now every other sentence in that article has grammar that's somewhere between "bizarre" and "just plain wrong". And I'm sorry for being blunt, but if you write "I didn't found", maybe you should leave grammar cleanup to others. Huon (talk) 21:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank's for your current contributions and future plans contributions. I am hoping the best. We will corporate a lot in future. Since I was planed to made a lot of new articles. We can help each other. Best regards, friend. ADHZ07111989 (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Egumball Inc.
Huon, thank you for the information. However, I believed that all of the articles about the company (OC business journal, yahoo, etc.) would count as independent sources that say more than enough about the company. If these are not enough, I will look for more.

Thank you AlexisGCA (talk) 20:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * That's a press release written by eGumball itself. It can't get much less independent than that. If there's an actual OC Business Journal article that discsses eGumball in some detail, it's not given in the Egumball Inc. article. Huon (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Miramaribelle
Hi, Huon. Boy, you're busier'n a bird dog. I admire your industry. Naturally I was crestfallen to see the GS entry notice...appeal for more encyclopedic writing. I realize you've been trying to warn me about this all along. I've tried to strip it of all feelings... Now if your concern is that so many of the references are from GS herself and therefore not provable, then I'm stymied. If so, I'll be curious to see what others can write that you'll approve of. Do please have another look at the Bette Davis article. Am I wrong or isn't it laced with commentary that is not "encyclopedic?" And for next time, it might be a good thing if you (I speak Wikiwise) would warn an editor such a posting is going up, give her/him and chance before shaming her/him publicly. All best, and thanks, SylviaMiramaribelle (talk) 23:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I will take a look in a couple of days, but I'm rather busy in real life and I won't immediately have the time to give the Gloria Stuart article the attention it deserves. Huon (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Rooster Teeth/ Achievement Hunter
I see your recent edits to Rooster Teeth but have to ask, where do you expect to find sources for this kind of article. The only possibly sources are there own websites and YouTube. Look at other YouTube wikis: Game Grumps and the like. Very few "reliable" sources. Thats something Wikipedia just has to deal with EoRdE6 (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has to deal with that by removing large chunks of content for wich no reliable, independent sources exist. If no reliable source has bothered to write about that, neither should Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 19:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Turdburglar
Did you see that was a throw-away account, in a line of such in the recent history of History of geology? Lady of  Shalott  23:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, but in the absense of a CheckUser there was nothing to do about it but blocking it, I'd say. Thanks for taking care of the other two. Huon (talk) 00:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: Help me
Thanks so much for your reference syntax assistance! -- Beland (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Repeated Upload Wizard failure
Hello Huon: long time! I am writing an article on CHAT (Cultural Historical Activity Theory – you will find the (exploratory) draft in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pronacampo9_/Main-subpages/Entry1 . Problem: I wanted to upload an illustrative graph on 1st Generation CHAT (which I would have included in this message if only I were able to upload anything at all. . ) My first attempt (in PDF) uploaded fine, but I aborted the upload process as I needed some more information. Since then, I have not been able to upload anything at all, even after the graph was converted into jpg and png: nothing works. I am completely at a loss about it. I tried a different computer, but that does not work either. I left a ‘Feedback’ message on the Main Upload wizard but I do not know who/where it will be attended to. Q: would you know of a Commons expert to whom I could address my question directly? and/or, who knows, you yourself may have a clue about what is wrong or what I am doing wrong while attempting to upload? Many, many thanks again! (Pronacampo9 (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC))

Houn at 'Chouchi'
I don't worry about removing the commentary of Chouchi. But, it is actually original text of references witch use for references. Since it is legal and authentic but really rare and I put it for security, then if we remove those things and any problem occur about the references, please help me indeed. Thank's. Visit ctext.org for more chinese text.ADHZ07111989 (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd say those kinds of "references" are completely useless. How would I, or any other of our readers, go about finding those sources? What are they? Ancient historical writings? Modern textbooks on Chinese history? In either case I'd expect that at the very least the authors' names have a standardized English transliteration, very likely the titles of the works as well. For example, "漾水" is unknown to Google Books or WorldCat, with the closest this book of Malaysian-Chinese short stories. I rather doubt that's what you want to use as a reference for a historical article. And whatever it ultimately is, a page number is given - is there but a single edition? Are all editions' page numbers identical? If not, which editition does this reference refer to?
 * Given your past attemts to present made-up empires as real, I'm very reluctant to trust something you add based on references I can't even identify. Huon (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=630964532 your edit] to Nakhi people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * houses are made by Bai craftsmen today. Absorbing architectural styles of the Han those same Nanjing traders brought their house building skills with them, and these are used up to
 *  李近春 and Wang, Chengquan 王承权: 纳西族 Naxizu (The Nakhi). 民族出版社 Minzu chubanshe'' (Nationalities Publishing House). 北京 Beijing 1984. 117 pages.

Yup! Problem solved


Thanks, Huon, and Yup! I/we “did” it. (see below – I am preparing two more graphs – in PP converted to png which I will upload & insert later). I am only describing the detail of ‘what happened’ for the sake of future wikipedistas who might run into a similar roadblock. In retrospect, I think that the ‘root’ of the problem was the upload of the original PDF which I aborted because the Wizard was asking for ‘categories’, which I needed to check up on, first. At the first attempt the Wizard had pre-uploaded and stamped the picture with “Pronacampo9” already. When I reentered the Wizard it would stubbornly ‘get stuck’ at the #2 Upload stage: it would advertise the title all right, but it seemed not be able to ‘grab’ the image itself: (re: the ‘timer’ icon would keep going round and round forever). I then converted the PDF into jpg and png but even so, the wizard remained ‘stuck’ at the upload stage. I tried several other computers, but ‘no go’. That’s when I got on your talkpage (I see you are as busy as ever!!). After reading your reply this morning, I tried again, this time on a small laptop, and, as you see, everything went smoothly. My hunch is that, in the intervening 48 hours the Wizard ‘sorted itself out’ automatically. The only other ‘variable’ is the small laptop I used this morning (in the previous attempts I had been using Library computers in the same computer cluster) but I really doubt it. It still looks like the Wizard got its knickers in a knot when I suddenly cut short an uploading process. Now, as I said these (rather boring) details are strictly for future reference in case others experience similar problems. Have a nice weekend, Huon, and thanks again! (Pronacampo9 (talk) 09:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC))


 * OK, good to see this has been resolved. If I may offer some advice on the image itself, I'd suggest not making the caption a part of the image. This goes particularly for the references - what would happen if Engeström 1999a were ever removed from the article, or if the image were added to a different article that currently doesn't cite Engeström at all? If you want me to, I can modify the image to that effect and add the sources on the file page itself instead. Huon (talk) 14:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Aye, aye, yes, please do so Huon - that would be both excellent & a useful template for the next two illustrative diagrams which I still have to insert. All good! (Pronacampo9 (talk) 15:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC))


 * Re: "Modify the image": I was just wondering about the technical implications of 'modifying' a jpg/png image? Would you not need the original - which is in Powerpoint - for this? If so, I would need to know an avenue by which to transmit (the pp). But perhaps I misunderstood? Regards. (Pronacampo9 (talk) 21:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC))


 * I intended to simply take the .jpg you uploaded and to cut off the caption via Paint. Huon (talk) 22:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. My technical knowledge of Paint is rather rudimentary, I am afraid, so not too sure how to go about this. Also, if the “Engeström/Nygård" caption is cut out, it would imbalance the overall outlay of the illustration, i.e. I would rather prefer to go back to the original template, and do the whole job all over again. . . on condition that I, also, can remove the picture which at present is on Wikimedia Commons. Is this possible? The only tab (left hand side column) I can see on WikiMedia Commons images says: “Nominate for deletion” – but that is not what we are looking for, is it? (Pronacampo9 (talk) 10:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC))


 * PS: What if. . .I leave the Engeström 1999/Nyrgård 2010 names in the caption, but with their full refs in a (small lettered) footnote ie all inside the illustrative graph. It would look a bit overloaded but perhaps worth attempting? RE: 1. 2. (Pronacampo9 (talk) 11:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC))

I have just created this version, simply by cutting off part of the description and some white space. I've uploaded it under a different name (as File:Vygotsky Basic Mediated Action.jpg), but in principle it would also be possible to update the ([[:commons:File:First Generation CHAT.jpg|existing file (disabled here); there's an "Upload a new version of this file" link in the "File history" section. My approach in general would be to keep information that could just as well be part of the caption out of the image itself; then the users on specific articles can decide on the appropriate style for a caption and for references, as I've done here.

Jeff Smisek
Hi Huon! Thank you for checking in on the Jeff Smisek page. There were many other links to sources like Motley Fool and other newspaper articles. But a previous editor (MusiAnimal) consolidated them into the one HuffPo article. That article has been reposted and quoted by many other news sources. It is not a blog. But if you wish to challenge the Fagen article, I think the best thing to do would be to establish consensus on the article's talk page. Thanks for your consideration. Lauraface32 (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to get too much more involved, but I think it may be the other way around, where consensus is needed to add the disputed content rather than remove it. Remember this a biography on a living person. Per this policy, any contentious material that is deemed poorly sourced should be removed without prior discussion. If we work together I believe we can accurately state what we want without being so disparaging. I also think I can speak for Huon and I that we don't have a particular interest in Smisek, rather we just want ensure content is within the confines of policy. &mdash;  MusikAnimal  talk 16:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I would take your comments about discussing the issue on the talk page a little more seriously if I hadn't already explained my edit there in detail, or if you had bothered to explain your own rationale there when reverting me. Huon (talk) 18:10, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the help
Appreciate you answering my WP:EASTER questions. Just goes to show there's some things I can still learn about properly editing Wikis. Live and learn and do better the next article. But again, appreciate the tips and advice. SanAnMan (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Rufus (band) article
Good day Huon... hope you are well. I have a question. I've done some work on the Rufus article. I noticed today someone edited it inserting information about another artist CONTINUE I ON to artist..but who is not a member of the group. THIS artist has his own wiki article where the same information is...as well as his name and credit is on the song "Once you get started..once again with the same information...that is repeated ver betim on EACH PAGE. Shouldn't there just be a reference to the song writer on the Rufus page and not all the repeated info.  And whoever edited it..the pushed off the credit for the song Sweet Thing which was written by Khan and Maiden...group members...so it looks insignificant to the success of the group... the contribution is by unknown party and I do not wish to get into any battle..but it looks like someone just trying to get credit everywhere and even looks like an attempt to make that person as much a part of the group and like THEY WERE THE ONE that made Khan and Rufus famous...and kinda down playing the group who made the artist lyricists work hit the charts.. please read give me feed back on my assessment. Thank you.hole ur well.

PoekneegurlPoekneegurl (talk) 04:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * This is why Wikipedia requires citations to reliable sources. You wrote that Rufus' greatest hit on that album was Sweet Thing, the other editor says it's Once You Get Started. Neither of you provided a reference. How are our readers supposed to tell which claim is correct?
 * Luckily for you, AllMusic agrees that Sweet Thing is the "biggest track" on that album. Thus I'll revert that edit and provide AllMusic as a reference to prove that the version I re-establish is the correct one. Huon (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Arnold Schwarzenegger's education
Thanks for the input. Will do. Prlitecky (talk) 23:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, happy editing! Huon (talk) 23:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Royal African Corps
Hi Huon, On 5 December 2014, you deleted the article "Royal African Corps" on the grounds of copyright violation. Is there any way to see what you deleted? Comparing my notes on this article with the website you referenced as the source of copyright violation do not indicate a problem. Before I recreate the article I would like to make sure that I am not setting it up for deletion. Cheers, Acad Ronin (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Practically the entire content from here had been copy-pasted and made up the majority of the article. Huon (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry
It's hard to switch from using "User Profile" to "user page". Sorry for the misunderstanding. 19:58, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Anvaya
Huon sahib, you have deleted this article objecting to the wording of one particular citation as infringing copyright.

In order to overcome copyright infringement I have revised that objectionable passage as follows:


 * The terms Anvaya and Vyatireka are used to establish the meaningfulness of components, and also to ascribe individual meanings to components. This is done by observing the concurrent occurrence (anvaya) of a certain meaning vis-a-vis a certain linguistic unit and identifying the absence of a certain meaning vis-a-vis a unit, which effort results in the understanding of a certain meaning depending upon the presence of a given 'root' or 'stem' or 'suffix' but when any one of these three are taken away or replaced then the original meaning is no longer understood or some other meaning arises in the mind of the hearer. This is so because a relationship holds between the evidence and the property to be confirmed.undefined

If this passage is o.k. can I resubmit this article for creation? Thanks.Aditya soni (talk) 10:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * That's better, but please note that the passage copy-pasted from Hayes was not the only problematic one. The sentence immediately afterwards was very closely paraphrased from Dunne, and there are further similar examples. Huon (talk) 12:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Huon Saheb, Thanks a lot. I have understood my mistake. I have re-phrased the relevant passages, and resubmitted this article for its creation. Regards.Aditya soni (talk) 12:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Resorting to False Allegations when you Don't Get your Way
Sockpuppetry!?!?!?! Really, Huon?!?!?!?! You have not challenged a single aspect of Fagin's argument. Simply because two people disagreed with you, you have accused them of being the same person? I have bent over backwards, making several of the very good changes that you suggested. I have also thanked you for inserting the Crains paragraph. But we have a fundamental disagreement over the relevancy of articles and the definition of synthesis. I have been, and will continue to be, happy to work with you on these things. But you must prove your position first. You must build consensus. Falsely alleging sockpuppetry is not a good way to do it. Grow up. This is cowardly and low.Lauraface32 (talk) 13:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * It's quite a coincidence that an all-new editor popped up to "disagree with me" immediately after I pointed out that so far, the head count was two-to-one in favor of my position. Not that the head count really matters, mind, because we don't merely count numbers but weigh how much the respective positions are grounded in policy. To me the claim that using a source that does not mention Smisek in the article about Smisek can be anything but synthesis is outright bizarre. And I don't have to convince you in order to build consensus - getting more community input will do. I dearly hope that article soon receives some additional scrutiny from experienced editors. Huon (talk) 14:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

It is not a coincidence, and I did not pop up suddenly. I have been in the airline industry for years. I was following the previous attempts to delete a balanced view from the Jeff Smisek page for several weeks -- long before you ever started editing it. It is true I never tried to edit anything before, but I hope to help out with other airline pages in the future. I had refrained from jumping in earlier because of the animosity, which I hate. As for the synthesis, it is you that are creating the synthesis by implying there was some universal resolution by late 2014. Topdog76 (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

You accepted this user's unblock request, but forgot to unblock them. MadGuy7023 (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Ooops! Thanks for pointing that out! Done now. Huon (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

's latest edit
I think that something new needs to be done, now that he's claiming WP:SOMEONEDIDIT about the latest unblock request. (See his talk page for the full argument with diffs). Origamiteⓣⓒ 17:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I have removed Karunyan's talk page access. Thanks for notifying me. Huon (talk) 18:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=639317663 your edit] to Nut (fruit) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * sickness: double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial|journal= QJM |volume=102 |issue=5 |pages= 341–8|doi=10.1093/qjmed/hcp026|pmid=19273551}}  {{cite journal|author=Bjelakovic G;

Thanks
For scarring my block-log, which had been kept clean for half a decade!

Only joking, we all make mistakes ;) Orphan Wiki (talk) 13:43, 23 December 2014 (UTC)


 * We messaged each other at the same time! Posted another reply on my talkpage ;) Orphan Wiki  14:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Ricky Byrd
Hi Huon, you previously protected Ricky Byrd in June - could you please have another look at doing so after the recent activity there? Thanks and Merry Christmas. Melcous (talk) 07:54, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notification. I am a little less active over the holidays, but Anna Frodesiak seems to have taken care of it. You may want to check out WP:RFPP for future protection requests; that page will receive attention from several admins, while nobody but me is likely to see your comments over here. Huon (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Task Force 1-41
Huon you have been very disrespectful to me and the men of this Task Force. We had a brigade from the British 1st Armoured division assigned to us at the Battle of Norfolk. You also make claims of these friendly fire incidents with incorrect numbers. You also are off ten years on the date of this battle. You are presenting incorrect facts yourself without any knowledge of the conflict or the units involved in the Task Force. Instead you single out a very small part of the Task Force's experience while overlooking the fact the Task force was awarded a Valorous Unit award. Maybe you should read two of the books I provided as references. Road to Safwan dedicates a entire chapter to the TF. Don Brunett (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Don BrunettDon Brunett (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The place to discuss the article is its talk page, not mine, and I'll reply over there. Huon (talk) 21:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Take a look at this new editor's user page. Weird. Dougweller (talk) 14:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, and the really weird parts by now have been removed by others. I believe the user means well but doesn't quite understand all the details of what he's doing. Huon (talk) 14:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Confirmation
This is just to confirm that you're on the panel that will close the Cultural Marxism AfD. The other administrators on the panel are Spartaz and Samwalton9. RGloucester — ☎ 17:33, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm well aware of that, thanks. Huon (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting that abusive MFD
...of my user page by. Jeh (talk) 02:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:Co-op
Hey Huon. I wanted to ask if you might be interested in mentoring one or more editors during our pilot of the mentorship space called the Co-op. We plan to run the pilot in late January for about one month. The idea is that mentors will be doing one-on-one teaching based on how an editor wants to contribute, and it's not some huge commitment to teach/learn comprehensively about Wikipedia. We also want to make to easier for new editors to find mentors as well. Your experience as an admin and fielding questions at will certainly be helpful. If you're interested, please sign up here and feel free to peruse, make suggestions, or ask questions about how the Co-op will work. Thanks a bunch (and Happy New Year!), <font color="green" face="Candara">I, JethroBT drop me a line 04:26, 30 December 2014 (UTC)