User talk:Huon/Archive18

Deletion
I am telling 10s of wikipedians to back off and listen. Anyway... All of my images are my own and have no license except the TowerCam. None of you has a reason to delete the images. Wiki Zachary (talk) 22:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * "Have no license" is by itself a reason to delete the images. Images on Wikipedia (with some exceptions that don't apply here) must be released under a free license. If you haven't released your images under a free license that allows others to re-use and modify them for any purposes, including commercial purposes, they must be treated as non-free, and since they don't meet Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, they must be deleted. Huon (talk) 23:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * After I told you about my images, I thought about it and added reasonable licenses.Wiki Zachary (talk) 23:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Rupert Loup
The other editor is still blocked, and Loup is still attacking him at COIN and NPOVN. This is what I was afraid would happen if only one was unblocked. Doug Weller (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Not sure I'd call that attacks, and while it's not particularly useful to discuss Inayity when they can't respond, it's in the proper venues. I've left Rupert loup a message. Huon (talk) 17:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Given the context over time of their relationship, I'd say they both frequently attack each other. But YMMV. Thanks for the comment on his talk page. Doug Weller (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

reply
You can delete this if you want. I'm just giving you notice that at my IP talk page, I left two replies to your section regarding Shawn, a.k.a. 0serenity.

thanks

Eric Ramus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.195.166.103 (talk) 22:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Europefan SPI Case
Seems like the user has popped up with yet another IP sock here. Just wanted to let you know, as you put a range block earlier today for this SPI case. However, do note that Slakr has blocked the IP; however, slakr did not do a range block. Pinging slakr for input to discussion. Please ping me when you reply. --JustBerry (talk) 00:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Czar's edits
Hi again, I'm not sure how to reply, and if you reply to this please notify me (somehow!)

Czar left redirects (in the case of the tech demos to Nvidia) which were disorientating, The Orb-3D link has been reverted and he's nominated it for deletion. Now the page doesn't read particularly well but the worst case is that it is advertising a decade old graphics card. If you're not very tech savvy, imagine if it talked about how great a car was (bad example with that VW thing) - okay imagine it talked about the amazing picture clarity of a TV from the 50s, It doesn't matter. But it is an important bit of history.

I was browsing the lists of old graphics cards (The lifespan of the 9800XT by ATI) and suddenly, I was at Nvidia's page! This was very odd. If someone had to I'd undertake the task of making the page, I am not fighting for it in a previous form, I am saying that what Czar did is unhelpful. He also seems to be doing it with games. They're tagged for cleanup, he removes stuff, removes the tag. It's absurd! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.204.46 (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * As I said the Orb-3D article was a copyright violation, which we cannot have at Wikipedia. I had to delete it. The other pages also look like copyright violations to me, but I'll have to do a little more research to find whether they are. If you have an issue with czar's conduct, you should first try and discuss it on his talk page. If the two of you cannot reach an agreement on how to proceed, based on Wikipedia's guidelines, you can try asking for more community input at the talk page of a relevant WikiProject, say Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Huon (talk) 18:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Ha-ha? :-)
not sure if he's playing.... I don't think this is going to get us anywhere, but at least we'll have shown enough willingness in the end, when we will revert it again or report him. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I've left a comment on the talk page. Huon (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey! Yep I read it, well summarised. But it continues again. The "error" of such people is that they have a single purpose reason of making edits here, usually individuals of the typical "e-warrior/e-nationalist" types with a clear pov-agenda, which makes any type of dialogue unfortunately very futile, even if the other party tries it's best. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I have requested page protection. Huon (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Good move. Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Buraq
lets talk this out instead of removing every last word I edited, I am not looking for a war just facts and truth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraq anything I added has reference. I did not remove the part you added. --Doctorman (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I have replied at the article's talk page. Let's keep the discussion about the article's content in one place. Huon (talk) 00:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Advice Sought
Hello Huon,

Since you seem to be an experienced editor, I would like your advice on how to deal with the harassment I am facing. The behavior I recently complained about here is continuing. Just today, that same editor followed me to yet another article he has never edited before, and again reverted my edit with a false claim of vandalism -. He is not participating in any talk page discussion where I have explained my edit (which is clearly not vandalism, but undoing  of original research not supported by the given source, and I am not the only one who objected to that material ) - he's just following  e around and undoing my edits. If I complain at WP:ANI, admins like The Blade of Northern Lights block me, using spurious claims of "disruption". What am I to do? When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * My suggestion would be to ask for formal dispute resolution, or you could ask at a relevant WikiProject (say, WT:WikiProject Politics for wider community input. Focus to the issue at hand, whether the given reference can be used to support that specific content. Maybe first take a moment to look whether you can find a more reliable source that supports the same basic premise - that would likely also resolve the issue. In fact, reliable sources associating Arutz Sheva with neo-Zionism seem rather easy to find: Huon (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * thank you. I will follow your advice which may solve  the specific issue at Neo-Zionism. What about the broader problem of being followed around by an editor who undoes my edits and falsely calls them vandalism? When Other Legends Are Forgotten (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't really have much advice to offer here, unfortunately. I have commented at that user's talk page (which they reverted without reply). The best advice I can give is to make sure that your own conduct is beyond reproof and, if necessary, ask for wider community input. Huon (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Greetings from faeilers on IRC
Hi Huon, Might you help me update my talk page so it properly archives? I see your "talk" page makes sense to me. I would also like to be a visual editor on Wikipedia at some point and someone who can approve AfC. Very fondly, Frederika Eilers (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC) http://mcgill.academia.edu/frederika


 * Hello Frederika Eilers. My own talk page is rather boring when it comes to archiving; I merely create a new sub-page every couple of months, add a link to the top of the talk page, and copy-paste threads from the past few months into the new sub-page. That method is also described at Help:Archiving a talk page. If you prefer, you can also set up a bot to archive your talk page automatically (for example by removing threads that have been inactive for a couple of days or weeks). ClueBot III is a bot commonly used for that purpose. If you want me to, I can set it up on your talk page with some basic settings that you can then fine-tune to fit your preferences.
 * I'm not quite sure what you mean by being a visual editor; if that refers to the WYSIWYG "Visual Editor" for editing Wikipedia, you can turn that on in your preferences among the beta features. Reviewing drafts at AfC requires quite some familiarity with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines; the formal requirement is an account 90 days old with 500 live edits to articles. Personally I find reviewing drafts rather mind-numbing, but others may disagree, and help over there will definitely be welcome when you meet the prerequisites. Huon (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Personal Finance Society
re your deletion

16:46, 9 October 2015 Huon (talk | contribs) deleted page Personal Finance Society (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events))

Can you advise why you dleted this entry for the largest group of financial advisers in the UK?

See http://www.thepfs.org/membership/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finantium (talk • contribs) 17:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I deleted that article because it provided no indication of the organization's importance and cited no reliable third-party sources. It didn't even say the subject was the largest group of financial advisers in the UK, much less provide evidence for that assertion.
 * By the way, the Financial Times disagrees with that assertion, and Google is unable to find them when I search for "largest group of financial advisers in the UK". Huon (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

It does not appear that you have done your research very well. The Personal Finance Society (PFS) is not a group or network of advisers that give advice on behalf of one firm or company. It is a professional organisation for financial advisers.

They are the professional body for the UK financial planning profession. Our 35,000+ members.

As an example, PricewaterhouseCoopers are a commercial firm of accountants with membership of the ICAEW. Similarly, large firms of financial advisers may be Chartered members of the PFS and the individual advisers will be members of the PFS.

Did you perhaps visit the link I directed to you above. Regarding importance perhaps you could visit

http://www.professionaladviser.com/tag/personal-finance-society http://www.ftadviser.com/2013/03/04/ifa-industry/companies-and-people/pfs-chartered-financial-planners-exceed-GVPLS5bmjlzUNfjdjqTJtK/article.html https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05084125 http://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/about-us/related-websites/  - look under trade associations and professional organisations http://www.equityreleasecouncil.com/news/the-equity-release-council-joins-personal-finance-society/

http://www.ftadviser.com/2015/03/30/ifa-industry/companies-and-people/pfs-writes-to-government-over-insistent-client-complaints-0BBX4DAo3zuI5GT1F3GrBN/article.html

The evidence is out there if you care to look and research accordingly. the PFS is affiliated to the Chartered Insurance Institute. go to http://www.cii.co.uk/qualifications/advanced-diploma-in-financial-planning-qualification/  and scroll to the bottom - you will find Chartered Financial Planner

In addition to the APFS designation, Advanced Diploma holders are eligible for Chartered Financial Planner status, subject to having five years' experience, not necessarily post-qualification.

Independent research confirms that the public places huge importance on talking to a professional; it also confirms that 'Chartered' is the most respected indicator of professionalism. The CII also offers corporate Chartered status to qualifying financial advice firms, further enhancing the visible professionalism of the advice sector. PFS Fellowship

Those wishing to continue their studies can also work towards Fellowship of the Personal Finance Society. A total of 350 credits are required to obtain the Fellowship, this must include obtaining 290 credits through completion of the Advanced Diploma in Financial Planning. The remaining 60 credits can come from any of the units offered within the CII financial services qualifications framework.

Please re-instate the pages relevant to the Personal Finance Society. many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andre1da (talk • contribs) 01:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I still do not see that the organization meets Wikipedia's standards of notability laid out at WP:ORG. Of the sources you provide, only the Financial Times articles would be helpful, and only the 2013 one discusses the Personal Finance Society in any detail. If there's more detailed media coverage of the Personal Finance Society, you're welcome to use the Article Wizard to create a draft that summarizes what those sources report. Should you disagree with my assessment and believe that I deleted the page in error, you are welcome to bring it to the community's attention at WP:Deletion review. Huon (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Redirects
Hello, I've been making them from a list I devised at User:A window cleaner me/sandbox. Could you please be a little more specific with an example of which ones you're referring to? I think that they are all plausible search queries. - A window cleaner me (talk) 23:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Some of those I'd consider the least likely are Docter H.H Holmes, Docter Webster Mudget, or Docter Herman Webster Mudget. For example, I don't think "Docter" is a likely misspelling, certainly not in conjunction with other misspellings or when added to the real name which generally is't associated with a doctoral degree. Inconsistent punctuation also doesn't give a particularly likely search term. I'm aware redirects are cheap, but this seems to be overkill. Huon (talk) 23:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

OK, I'll try my best to heed your instructions. - A window cleaner me (talk) 23:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ANI report
I filed this ANI report.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Someone_is_spamming_the_name_Gautam_Mrinaal_in_Bollywood_pages. No one has replied. --The Avengers (talk) 00:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * And you're telling me because...? Huon (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Because you are an administrator. This guy just selects random Bollywood article and adds his name.--The Avengers (talk) 04:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Given that there are a thousand admins, give or take a few, that's no reason to single out me, specifically. Anyway, what do you expect me to do about it? Those IPs aren't particularly closely related, so an IP range block wouldn't easily work without massive collateral damage. I rather don't think we should semi-protect all possible Bollywood articles, either. The best option I can think of is to search for key phrases to locate ad revert the vandalism - and that doesn't require an admin. Huon (talk) 19:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * I appreciate it, coming from another tireless helper. Huon (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

John Wesley
Hello, Huon. On the John Wesley Budweiser Beer Ad section you have a problem with, the significance of this event is that the misrepresentation of John Wesley in this add inspired the early 20th-century American Methodists to become the leaders in the American Temperance Movement. The ad was quite controversial. If you like, I can include some of the rebuttals toward this ad. On my qualifications, if you like, I can copy you with the email replies from the leading men at the Methodist Historical Archives (GCAH) who have for the last two decades sent me letters of commendation for piecing together the history of John Wesley's young protege, Francis Asbury. My recent book, Black Country, details the Wesleyan movement and its effects on Francis Asbury before he departs for the American Colonies in 1771. In addition, Black Country seeks to do that which has not been attempted before, to honor and bring to life Asbury's early preaching circuits in the West Midlands and Southern parts of 18th-century England. Please know that I'm open to suggestions on this information about John Wesley. I consider it, as well as several Wesley scholars, valuable to the legacy of our dear Wesley. Let me know. Thank you. Al DeFilippo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al DeFilippo (talk • contribs) 16:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia content should be based on reliable published sources such as history books published with an academic publisher. If such sources have reported about how the Methodists were spurred by this misappropriation of Wesley into supporting the temperance movement, a short summary in the legacy section, citing those sources, might be appropriate, though I wonder whether the article on the temperance movement itself wouldn't be a better place for that content. The ad may have been controversial, but does a discussion of a controversial ad created long after Wesley's death really improve our readers' understanding of Wesley? I rather don't think so. Huon (talk) 18:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Huon, I respect your opinion. Would you consider an opinion that differs from yours on this? It is the opinion of Dr. Ben Witherington III that the ad is significant. I can submit his opinion which he emailed to me as well as Dr. Kenneth Kinghorn. Both men are Wesley scholars who I have shared the ad with. In addition, on your request of published sources on this event, here is a link to the Western Christian Advocate rebuttal which was published on August 19, 1908. The article defends Wesley quite well. I reference it in my blog post, but didn't want to repeat on the Wiki page. I can reword some of the blog post if you like. Here is link to ad: https://books.google.com/books?id=aJYxAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA6-PA42&lpg=RA6-PA42&dq=john+wesley+and+budweiser+beer+ad&source=bl&ots=7v8xFg0kUF&sig=fUVM81P867D21jbkboUXUzuIt-o&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAWoVChMIzJ3d9PLPyAIVA-RjCh2_8wFx#v=onepage&q=john%20wesley%20and%20budweiser%20beer%20ad&f=false. Here is the link to my blog post, perhaps it would help to see the significance of this event. http://www.francisasburytriptych.com/john-wesley-budweiser-beer-ad/. If you like, I can forward Dr. Witherington and Dr. Kinghorn's opinions they emailed me. Thank you again for your reply. Both men have allowed me to cite them if needed. I will in a follow up blog post on my website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al DeFilippo (talk • contribs) 01:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The article's talk page may be a better place to discuss the improvement of the article than mine; interested editors are much more likely to find the discussion. I'll reply there. Huon (talk) 01:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

deprod
I have removed the prod tag from Spencer Saylor, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A51D:74AE:FC51:1E65 (talk) 19:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

YGM
Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Duarte Galactosemia article "help me" response
Hi Huon, thank you for your response to my "help me" on my talk page about my medical references tag on the Duarte Galactosemia article. I responded on there but wanted to respond to you directly as well. There are references now in all of the places that had been indicated as needing medical references before, but the tag is still on my article. The references were actually there in the first place but were removed by some other editor for some reason. Can you let me know if anything else needs to be done to remove this last tag from my article? I would really appreciate it. Thank you!

Jfridovichkeil (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I have replied at your talk page. Huon (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

08:42:23, 14 November 2015 review of submission by Pianogac
Huon

Re my draft for Olga Jegunova

Can you please tell in detail why you have "declined" my latest effort? You will understand this is a minefield for anyone new to contributing to wikipedia!

Thanks

Geoff


 * As the message box I left at the draft says, there were no inline citations, making it impossible for our readers to tell which of the references supports which part of the draft's content. For example, "Olga Jegunova has taken part in numerous master classes with Andras Schiff, Ferenz Rados, Elisso Virsaladze, Mikhail Voskresensky and Lazar Berman." - which of the draft's three references should I look up to verify that statement? Such a statement should be accompanied by a footnote pointing out the relevant source. See WP:INCITE and WP:REFB for more details on why and how to provide such inline citations.
 * Actually it seems that none of the references support the draft's content; all are merely passing mentions that do not cover Jegunova in any detail. None mentions any master classes. None mentions any awards Jegunova has won. None mentions her education, or any information about her at all except that she's Latvian. That raises a more basic issue, namely whether Jegunova is notable enough for a Wikipedia article in the first place. Huon (talk) 11:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you very much for your support and help! I appreciate you! Love, jdxzhu

jdxzhu 17:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC) 

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Joseph Nolan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bethesda and International Convention Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Belated thank you!!
Hi Huon, I wanted to thank you, albeit very belatedly for your changes to the SAP SE article, involving the Board and acquisitions. I've been traveling heavily this summer and fall, but just wanted to tell you that it's terrific you keep such a close eye on this page!! I've also added a request for a link to be added to the reference about SAP S/4HANA this morning, so please let me know if you might approve that. The link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAP_S/4HANA. All the best. Harper70 (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Harper70

Cloud Side Application Article
--Yoram Bucks (talk) 19:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you ytsamaha (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Huon he is needing you...
Hello Huon! Brother! Hey you know that bub, 50.179.194.186? Yeah the one that was so called "removing content"? Well i read his story, did some reasearch and found out that he is really just a guy who is out there to clear vandalism and to make new facts even if they are sometimes unknowingly incorrect. Knollwood IS a neighborhood of Lake Bluff as a fact and he was not calling any of the admins or other editors (besides OgKushWizard) "vandal scum". So help him out and just unblock him. Read his story on his talk. I bet you a million dollars he wont "remove content" again. No SineBot I do not want you to Sign me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.32.32.68 (talk) 15:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * And you did that research how, exactly? As an aside, you can avoid SineBot signing your talk page comments by signing yourself with four tildes .Huon (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Sandeep Maheshwari
Hi Huon, I tried creating a page for Sandeep Maheshwari, a notable enterpreneur and a public figure with supporting references. However, the privilege to create the page is restricted to admins only seemingly because of multiple creation and deletion under wikipedia G11 rule way back in 2012 and 2013. You being the last admin to delete the page, I just want to know whether this blocking can be reverted so that I can create the page? If it is irriversible, I'd want to request you to create a simple page with the title and allow me to complete the page as I've already got the draft almost ready. Will this be possible? It would be great if the page can be created by any means as the person in question is a youth icon in India. --Split25 (talk) 11:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC) Thank you.


 * My suggestion would be to complete the draft first, for example in your sandbox. When it's ready to go live I'll help get it moved to the proper location. Huon (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the tip, didn't know I can do that. Will try to figure it out.--Split25 (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * can you please check the draft here User:Split25/sandbox and let me know? Thank you!--Split25 (talk) 06:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but that draft is not suitable to become a live article. Just like the previously-deleted articles it is insufficiently referenced (with many sources originating with Maheshwari himself or only mentioning him in passing; much of the content does not cite any sources at all), and the content is unduly promotional. If that page were moved into articlespace it would immediately be nominated for deletion again.
 * When you have fixed those problems you can submit the draft for a review by an experienced editor by adding  to the very top, including the curly brackets. Huon (talk) 22:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy ten year wikiversary!
Hi, Huon. I'd like to wish a happy ten years on Wikipedia to one of our most dedicated users and admins! Not only do you do good work, but the help you provide to others, both on- and off-wiki, has surely guided and inspired many new users to contributing constructively themselves. Congratulations and thank you! Here's to ten more!  Cheers, Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 23:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot. It has been an interesting time, and I look forward to what the future may bring. Huon (talk) 02:36, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Huon, I need your help
Brother Huon.

Recently you admin has proposed my page for speedy deletion and it has deleted, here is the Page URL on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._MajId_M._Al_Gethami_Al_Otaibi

I have seen that there are thousands of noted professors profiles are there on the Wikipedia. My page also belongs to one of the noted associate professor in saudi arabia, now who is DEAN of Information Technolgoy.

Do you want me to re write the article and publish ? Can you please suggest me the way to re publish the article again. I will re-write it and put in sandbox for you to review or I request you to create a simple page with the title and allow me to edit rest of the page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unus32 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * As I noted on your talk page, you will need to show that those people were the subjects of significant coverage in reliable published sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines. The sources you provided (at least those for the article I checked) all were passing mentions that reported on some board meeting or the like and did not provide any details on Fahad Ahmed Yahya Al-Zahrani. You may want to take a look at our guidelines on notability, WP:BIO and WP:PROF. Then I'd advise you to use the Article Wizard to write a new draft that summarizes (in your own words) what those sources report. Huon (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Brother Huon.

Recently, I have updated the article and has provided one more link as resource. Please visit and do let me your suggestion. If everything fine, then I will convert draft into article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unus32 (talk • contribs) 05:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

I Drink Your Blood Reply
Just to let you know. I replied to your comment on my talk page for the tag I posted for I Drink Your Blood. I have also added more information on the film's reception to the actual article but I need more reviews from notable critics, preferably ones published on the time of its release so that I can have a retrospect on the review it got upon its initial release and reviews it has later received.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Huon get this guy out of here quick!
Huon. Yep. Ok, so here is what is going on. This guy 85.233.61.35, he has been very insulting and distruptive. Look at the bottom of MY talk and that will give you a link to HIS talk. He is not nice. Not nice at all. I hope you can block him for me. Tanks! 50.179.194.186 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You should see the comment I did on his talk page, it was very funny. :)--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:DFTT seems relevant here. Poking blocked editors generally is a bad idea unlikely to improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Poking blocked editors?--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Leaving mocking comments on their talk pages, as you did here. Huon (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Yeah I kind of thought that. Couldn't help myself though.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Good Faith Confusion
Huon brother I am back. It seems that your recent edit on Great American Scream Machine (Six Flags Great Adventure) did not appear constructive. The link was already used in the -not to be confused by- section and was not useful in this case. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me on my talk. Tanks! 50.179.194.186 (talk) 14:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I have replied at the article's talk page, a better location for a discussion of the article's content than your talk page or mine. Huon (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for unblock
Thank you for unblocking me Huon. I will try and stay under the rules this time. PokestarFan (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PokestarFan (talk • contribs) 21:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Huon (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:151.54.56.243
IP had reverted my decline before you got there, not sure if you noticed. I've restored it and see you removed their use of the talk page, thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

User:Mikelinsf edits to Periscope (app)
Very questionable additions with outright plagiarism of sources, peacock terms and inflation of numerical facts. I went through and corrected what I could find in an about 90 minutes coming from almost no knowledge of Periscope. I mostly retired from Wikipedia because of this trend of fake news sources, paid editors, frustration with my increasingly slower ability to edit. Goodluck and good work. 97.85.173.38 (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and happy new year


Merry Christmas and happy new year. (: --Pine✉

Season's Greetings!!
Happy Holidays text 2.png Happy Holidays Huon, I hope you like this Wiki-bauble I made for specially helpful people like yourself. My very best wishes for 2016!! --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Huon: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Philip J Fry  /  talk  22:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Seeking advice regarding external links
Hello, my friend. I recently posted at User talk:Leadly, in response to another's removal of an external link that he added. I asked Leadly to not "promote his website at Wikipedia". I felt that they were WP:ELNO #11 "...Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority..." I may have been wrong. I felt that, although the sites are non-commercial, the user was promoting them and now he is upset. Perhaps I was influenced by the fact that both sites are owned by the same person and guessed that the editor is that person, and that the editor who added them has only made five edits, three of which have been to add the external links. Should these external links be permitted? They are very nice images, albeit watermarked with their website. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I am completely baffled how you can assume that promoting a community resource is somehow inseparably bound to self promotion. The sites in question while created by me have been mostly static for years. In fact, they both predate Wikipedia. So, if promoting user access to a relevant resource intended for the communities enjoyment is in fact deemed selfish then it will serve as proof that the pessimistic adage of "No good deed goes unpunished" is in fact true. Good luck, do as you wish... links or no links... no matter... I've had my fill of this drama. --Leadly (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Shall we keep this at User talk:Leadly? The discussion is getting split up. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Huon!


Happy New Year! Huon, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message