User talk:Hupaleju

Welcome!

Hello, Hupaleju, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Inflation
Hi Hupaleju, I notice you've been adding inflation figures to a few articles. In some cases it might not be a great idea. I don't know of any centralised discussion on how to use inflation figures, but there was some talk at WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Kenilworth Castle on how to use them. The source I've seen used most often is http://measuringworth.com/ukearncpi/ but the equations only go back as far as 1264. For this reason I've undone your edit to Peveril Castle, and people have reverted your additions to a couple of other articles. Reliable figures would obviously be useful to a reader, even a rough estimate, but the further back in time you go the trickier it is. Nev1 (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree! There was a discussion not so long ago at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_article_candidates/archive47 which more or less concluded that sums from earlier than about 1850 should not be converted in this way, which I think is about correct. Before that the effective different rates of inflation for different types of amounts make the whole thing too misleading. Johnbod (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, I think the worries expressed in that discussion are vastly overstated. The role of inflation templates is to convert a notional amount in, say, 1850 to the equivalent amount for e.g. 2010, and the best way to do this is using final consumer prices (because they're familiar to the average reader, and--more abstractly--because consumption ultimately drives all economic activity).  Yes, the relations between different "types" of amount could and did change over time, but these are real relations which are entirely unrelated to differences in the unit of account.  For instance, if real interest rates were higher in 1850 than 2010, this means that the economy of 1850 was more "present-oriented" and less "future-oriented", in a precise sense.  This has pervasive consequences on cost of durable assets, return on invested capital, etc.  Similarly for other changes such as price of real estate, precious metals, food commodities, and the like.  Hence, some real values are going to look slightly unfamliar from the POV of a contemporary reader.  But this is a genuine difference in the structures of production at any given time, not a matter of measurement. --Hupaleju (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

).css( listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ).css(. Since you had some involvement with the ).css( redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ï¿½ (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)