User talk:Hurleyterren

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of reportedly haunted locations has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of reportedly haunted locations was changed by Hurleyterren (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961964 on 2017-01-03T11:09:55+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adelaide Gaol. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 11:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adelaide Gaol, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Adelaide Gaol was changed by Hurleyterren (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853497 on 2017-01-03T12:10:47+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, I hope you don't mind a bit of advice here. The problem is that content added to Wikipedia articles should be supported by reliable sources - Yamla has given you links to WP:RS (which explains what Wikipedia regards as reliable sources) and WP:CITE (which explains how to cite them). We can't just accept material added with the justification that it is "well known", because it would need to be verifiable by the reader. I don't doubt your good faith here, but not everyone is as well meaning as you - and imagine the nonsense people could add if we just allowed everyone to base their contributions on what they say is "well known"! If you want to be unblocked, you would need to make a request that shows you understand this, and convinces a reviewing admin that you will not make any more unsourced changes or additions to Wikipedia articles. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, the other thing I should add is that when other editors revert your additions and leave you messages here on your talk page (which should give you a notification right at the top of your window), you should stop what you are doing, take note of what they say, and start talking if you don't understand the problem. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)