User talk:Hurndell

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Wtv cmyk-1-.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Wtv cmyk-1-.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, Hurndell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Veriss (talk) 05:54, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Talkback
Veriss (talk) 06:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

World Television article and WP: COI
(Moved from Veriss1 talk)

Hi there

You reviewed my page about World Television some time ago and suggested there may be a conflict of interest. Could you please suggest how I can fix this - I have tried to provide as many sources as possible and write in using an impartial tone.

Many thanks Hurndell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurndell (talk • contribs) 15:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I reviewed your new article and noted that there appeared to be indications that the editor of the article was affiliated with the subject of the article back in Feb 2011. The first source for an editor who may have a relationship with the subject of an article is WP:COI.  I am not an expert on this topic but the link should lead you to additional policies and procedures an involved editor can follow to contribute without crossing certain "redlines".  I take responsibility for my review and will help you as much as I can to resolve the issue so feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.  After a quick glance, there may be problems with several of the sources referenced, please also read over Help:Find sources.  Cheers, Veriss (talk) 05:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * You have not been online to see my reply for nearly a month so I am moving my reply to your question on my talk page to your own talk page where you can review it when you next log in. Sincerely, Veriss (talk) 02:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World Television logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:World Television logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)