User talk:Huronton

arbcom-I@lists.wikipedia.org I appealed blockad received respond: Hello Huronton,

You were blocked for sockpuppetry. Unless you can address that, you will not be unblocked.

King of Hearts English Wikipedia Administrator Honestly the respond look for me verry unclear: "Unless you can address that..." What that means? What is the: "address that..." mean? I explained very clearly in my appeal what I experience in my attempt to edit Wikipedia truthfully. And what is wrong with the system. Please read it. The addministrator did not infor me what I need do to "address that..." Moreover when I used attached link: Send a response by clicking here I got: "The action you requested could not be performed" This is popular Catch 22, and next example how Wikipedia works. Look on example of Polish Wikipedia, there is two stage editoin: proposal and review by more experienced and specialized editor/administrator, as result less confuses and edit wars. I already mentioned the administrators must be more teachers and advisors. Thous who are power lovers and POV colabolators like to be policemen. Thouse have to be eliminated. PS. The above last example about Unblock Ticket Request System is just show how dedicated person can be discarded from comunity and his good intention stressed. If you atempt to continue an issue you damp this or other way by most viccious individuals.

-- http://toolserver.org/~unblock/p/

This is mass action about I believe many people whose were accused and blocked by nationalistic German editors with help of their friends calling themselves administrators. I was blocked already on by the same administrators and the administrator constantly uses the same argument that I am somebody else (Serafin) who was blocked indefinitely. This outrageous. On the base of similar point of interest or something else block indefinitely many others users. Seems to me the German nationalists use the same trick again and again.

I am interested in Polish history and it happened that the West Poland (Recovered Territories) history is permanently attacked by German revisionists. This is outrageous how they use Wikipedia for their POVs and nationalistic propaganda. They are avoiding discussions on forcing their POV without considering facts. I believe this kind of activity can be stopped only by closed watch and principle of scientific discussion.

This obviously stress when you attempt to follow scientific discussion and instead you experience brutal actions. In first place if somebody ask for simple answer to simple question the principle should be: "answer or go away". No reasonable answer to reasonable question and following POV should be enough to administrator request editor to leave the space or follow the principal rules. Thus I ask simple question and give facts - when Nationalist do not have answer call his friend administrator and you re blocked. That is brutal.

Yes. I see already the administrator Boards is very much friendly to fellow administrators. I already reported on some and I received not respond. The administrators ethic requirements should be much higher. I already suggested that they should rather be ethically responsible teachers and advisers in first and police enforcement last. Nationalistic and power lovers administrators like to be policemen at once and they enjoy it making Wikipedia very messy space. ---