User talk:Hussein mmbaga

.

Welcome!
Hello, Hussein mmbaga, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Dogra–Tibetan War does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Using an edit summary of "#WPWP #WPWPARK" is entirely unhelpful. Please stop doing this. Please use an edit summary that actually describes what you are doing. Please see Help:Edit summary. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok after doing some digging, I've found Guide on how to use WPWP Campaign Hashtags which talks about the use of these edit summaries for tracking purposes. However, please note Guide_on_how_to_use_WPWP_Campaign_Hashtags which discourages using just the hashtags. Few people know what these hashtags mean. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * PLEASE stop using edit summaries like this and add something descriptive to it so that people unaware of this campaign can understand the edit summary. If you persist in doing this you may eventually be blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Eliezer Papo
Please check the details of the photograph, it's not an image of Eliezer Papo. Regards Denisarona (talk) 17:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Do not modify or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are welcome to make a new request. WP:GAB goes into more details. --Yamla (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

It's unclear if you are trolling or simply can't understand English well enough to understand what you've done wrong or to understand what you are being told, over and over again. You were not blocked for "adding pictures a rough way and made some mistakes when I have done editing photos". These unblock requests are going nowhere and raise serious concerns with WP:CIR; I suggest the next reviewing admin revoke talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. — Voice of Clam 10:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)